“…The harmful effects of ZnONPs are driven by their physicochemical properties (dissolution and formation rate, the morphology and chemical composition, surface reactivity, particle number) and the resulting physical damage caused by the aggregation and agglomeration of nanoparticles (Bai et al, 2010;Jiang et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2010. The bio-kinetic behaviour and in vivo toxicity of ZnONP exposure has, to date, been investigated in several non-mammalian systems including in vitro cell-based assays (Sharma et al, 2012a,b;Ahamed et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2010), bacteria (Li et al, 2011;Reddy et al, 2007), algae (Franklin et al, 2007), plants (Lin and Xing, 2007), crustaceans (Poynton et al, 2011), fish (Bai et al, 2010), earthworms (Hooper et al, 2011) and nematodes (Khare et al, 2011;Ma et al, 2009;Ma et al, 2011;Roh et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2013). The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a powerful model organism due to the availability of a completely sequenced genome (Hillier et al, 2005) and many molecular genetics tools has been used in ecotoxicological research to study the molecular to organismal level responses to ROS and heavy metal challenges (Roh et al, 2006;Hughes and Sturzenbaum 2007;Swain et al, 2004Swain et al, , 2010Zeitoun-Ghandour et al, 2010; The roles of the metalloproteins metallothionein (MT) and phytochelatin (PC) are Furthermore, ZnONP mediated toxicity may result from the release of free ionic zinc (George et al 2010;Li et al, 2012;Poynton et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2009), which induces cellular damage via the generation of free reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn can promote pro-inflammatory effects Mocchegiani et al, 2011). assumed to be multi-functional, including metal sequestration, transportation, detoxification, protection against antioxidants …”