2014
DOI: 10.1179/2047773214y.0000000160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxoplasmosis in dogs: first report ofToxoplasma gondiiinfection in any animal species in Angola

Abstract: Despite the worldwide importance of zoonotic parasite Toxoplasma gondii, nothing is known of toxoplasmosis in animals in Angola. The present study aimed at estimating the seroprevalence and also at assessing correlates of T. gondii infection in pet dogs from Luanda, Angola. Dogs (n5103) brought to a veterinary clinic in the city of Luanda were investigated. Serum samples were tested for antibodies to T. gondii with a modified agglutination test (MAT) commercial kit, at serial dilutions of 1 : 20 to 1 : 160. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This level of seroprevalence was noticeably lower than in other studies, such as 98.0% in Egypt ( El Behairy et al, 2013 ) and 83.5% in Thailand ( Jittapalapong et al, 2009 ). Nevertheless, it was substantially higher than those observed in pet dogs from other regions, such as 9.4% in Thailand ( Jittapalapong et al, 2007 ), 15.5% in Angola ( Lopes et al, 2014 ), and 10.8% in northeast China ( Wu et al, 2011 ). The differences in seroprevalence rates among these countries may have been due to the different serological techniques used and the distinct environmental and management conditions in various parts of the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This level of seroprevalence was noticeably lower than in other studies, such as 98.0% in Egypt ( El Behairy et al, 2013 ) and 83.5% in Thailand ( Jittapalapong et al, 2009 ). Nevertheless, it was substantially higher than those observed in pet dogs from other regions, such as 9.4% in Thailand ( Jittapalapong et al, 2007 ), 15.5% in Angola ( Lopes et al, 2014 ), and 10.8% in northeast China ( Wu et al, 2011 ). The differences in seroprevalence rates among these countries may have been due to the different serological techniques used and the distinct environmental and management conditions in various parts of the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…1 ). Using statistical theory, the representative sample size was calculated as n = [1 – (1-CL)1/e] × (N – (e – 1)/2] (CL: Confidence Level (95%), e: number of detectable individuals with the event in the population (e = N × p × Se), where p is– expected prevalence at 15% ( Lopes et al, 2014 ), Se is sensitivity of IFAT at 80% ( Liu et al, 2015 )); thus, a sample size (n) of 22 was determined. However, it was decided to collect 103 samples for better representation and to compensate for rejected samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using MAT and a cut-off titre of 20, antibodies to T. gondii were found in 15.5% out of 103 dogs from Luanda (Lopes et al, 2014), representing a statistically significant difference to the present results in cats (3.9%; p = 0.005). On the other hand, seropositivity of Leishmania spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…In the present study, the odds of a cat being seropositive increased by an average factor of 1.58 for each 1-year increase in age. It can be assumed that increasingly older cats have had more chances to eat tissues of infected animals or to have contact to the surrounding environment potentially contaminated with T. gondii oocysts (Lopes et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining percentage of positivity in dogs was distributed between the age ranges of 1–5 months (A1; 18.1%) and 6–12 months (A2; 30.9%), displaying an increase of T. gondii infection closely related to the age of the animal. Adult dogs have a longer exposure time to different risk factors that may increase the chances of infection and contribute to the spread of the parasite in the environment [ 51 ]. These animals can ingest oocysts which are subsequently eliminated through the feces without any process of multiplication of the parasite occurring [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%