2002
DOI: 10.1080/09614520220104266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade liberalisation in the garment industry: Who is really benefiting?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They will do little for those in the informal end of the traded continuum, even less for those in the nontraded informal economy and may end up increasing the incentives to informalize. There is a danger that they will simply serve to set up a privileged enclave for the few while curtailing employment opportunities for the many (Bardhan, 2000;Hale, 2002;Kabeer, 2004).…”
Section: Labor Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They will do little for those in the informal end of the traded continuum, even less for those in the nontraded informal economy and may end up increasing the incentives to informalize. There is a danger that they will simply serve to set up a privileged enclave for the few while curtailing employment opportunities for the many (Bardhan, 2000;Hale, 2002;Kabeer, 2004).…”
Section: Labor Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e increased competition is putting severe pressure on producers to adapt and restructure their organizations in an industry that is already characterized by its labor intensiveness (Taplin, Winterton, and Winterton 2003). Within this rapidly changing and increasingly competitive environment, some producers are "likely to lose the whole of their export industry" (Hale 2002).…”
Section: History Of Confl Ict In the Garment Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manufacture of garments in export‐processing zones, such as that found in Mauritius, and the attendant implications for Third World economies and conditions of work in garment factories have been well documented (Pearson 1998; Hale 2002), with an overwhelming focus upon forms of exploitation. Yet the over‐emphasis on sites of production in the ‘periphery’ for corporations and markets located in the ‘core’ and the somewhat systemic, linear conceptualization of global commodity chains (Hughes and Reimer 2004) have marginalized studies of consumption more broadly, but also downplayed the scope for appropriation and trade which emerge out of the leakages and opportunities at sites of production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%