1999
DOI: 10.1136/ip.5.1.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditional public health injury control does not apply to violence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the definition of “injury” varies across agencies whose mandate covers injury control and/or prevention, most include suicide and homicide along with the more standard topics such as motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), falls, and unintentional poisonings. However, the question of whether intentional injuries, such as suicidal behavior and serious assault, belong under the same conceptual roof as unintentional injuries has been raised (Fisher, 1999). Although both classes of injury deal with physical trauma, they seem to have such obviously different contexts and causes that there seems no reason to have them studied or dealt with within the same agency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the definition of “injury” varies across agencies whose mandate covers injury control and/or prevention, most include suicide and homicide along with the more standard topics such as motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), falls, and unintentional poisonings. However, the question of whether intentional injuries, such as suicidal behavior and serious assault, belong under the same conceptual roof as unintentional injuries has been raised (Fisher, 1999). Although both classes of injury deal with physical trauma, they seem to have such obviously different contexts and causes that there seems no reason to have them studied or dealt with within the same agency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%