2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic congestion propagation inference using dynamic Bayesian graph convolution network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the experiment, we choose the batch size as [16,32,64], the learning rate as [0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02], the number of GRU layers as (Bangwayo-Skeete & Skeete, 2015;Kato & Yamamoto, 2020;Liu, Ullah, et al, 2020;Sakamanee et al, 2020;Wang, 2020), the input time as (Bian et al, 2020;Fu et al, 2016;Lin et al, 2020;Luan et al, 2022;Wu et al, 2004;Zhang et al, 2018), the number of hidden units as [16,32,64,100,128], and analyze the change of the prediction accuracy. show that when the learning rate value is 0.01, the RMSE is the smallest, and the accuracy is the highest.…”
Section: Experimental Results With Varying Parameter Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the experiment, we choose the batch size as [16,32,64], the learning rate as [0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02], the number of GRU layers as (Bangwayo-Skeete & Skeete, 2015;Kato & Yamamoto, 2020;Liu, Ullah, et al, 2020;Sakamanee et al, 2020;Wang, 2020), the input time as (Bian et al, 2020;Fu et al, 2016;Lin et al, 2020;Luan et al, 2022;Wu et al, 2004;Zhang et al, 2018), the number of hidden units as [16,32,64,100,128], and analyze the change of the prediction accuracy. show that when the learning rate value is 0.01, the RMSE is the smallest, and the accuracy is the highest.…”
Section: Experimental Results With Varying Parameter Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the direct accessibility between scenic spots affects the traffic volumes at and near these scenic spots. For example, traffic congestion in one place propagates through the road network to other places (Luan et al, 2022). Therefore, the traffic jam near one scenic spot may cause a delay in traffic in another if the two spots are easily accessible from one to the other (e.g., directly connected by subway or bus).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, BN [11,41] has also been applied to congestion propagation [9,24,45]. Other propagation models include the Gaussian mixture model [38], congestion tree structure [49], and Bayesian GCN [25]. Yet we focus on the root causes analysis instead of congestion propagation.…”
Section: Congestion Causes Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Causal analysis of congestion has been highly demanded in applications of intelligent transportation systems. There is emerging research applying classical DAGs for modeling the probabilistic dependency structure of congestion causes and analyzing the probability of traffic congestion given various traffic condition scenarios [1,17,25]. When mining the causality for traffic congestion, as the classical DAG-based solution, a traffic intersection is usually regarded as a DAG, whereas different congestion-related traffic variables (e.g., lane speed and signal cycle length) are treated as nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Casual discovery aims to analyze causal relationships behind statistical correlations of different variables and facilitate better machine learning. Typical approaches to incorporate causal discovery include encoding features from domain-specific causal models as input to downstream tasks [18] and learning the structure of causal relationships between features for graph-based models [19,20]. As a powerful graph-based tool for modeling directed causal relationships between variables, Bayesian network (BN) is being applied in traffic prediction [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%