2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training OF Psychology Students in the Scientific Methods of Research

Abstract: In the training of psychology students in the Faculty of Psychology at the Southern Federal University (Russia, Rostov-on-Don) practice and exposure to the methods of scientific psychology are employed. Student conduct research in the motivation by using hardware that measures a variety of physiological responses. To assess motivation, students were trained to use the following measurements: assessment of social and psychological attitudes; need for affiliation; achievement motivation; cognitive orientation; n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the respective findings specifically validate the two theories of bandwagon and social influence applied in this study. This is because it shows the position of Fedotova [15], Vorobyeva and Ermakov [36] that though students in institutions of higher learning are usually exposed to many forms of research methods trainings as focus group discussions, case studies, surveys, projective techniques, and statistical methods but end up in a bandwagon and social influence in choosing research methods without resort to the application of creativity. The two theories are useful in this work since students in institutions of higher learning are expected to have understanding the research methods in their studies to make valid and reasonable conclusions and inferences.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the respective findings specifically validate the two theories of bandwagon and social influence applied in this study. This is because it shows the position of Fedotova [15], Vorobyeva and Ermakov [36] that though students in institutions of higher learning are usually exposed to many forms of research methods trainings as focus group discussions, case studies, surveys, projective techniques, and statistical methods but end up in a bandwagon and social influence in choosing research methods without resort to the application of creativity. The two theories are useful in this work since students in institutions of higher learning are expected to have understanding the research methods in their studies to make valid and reasonable conclusions and inferences.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kemampuan siswa dalam menggunakan fasilitas berbasis teknologi ini diharapkan bukan hanya sebagai strategi kreatif dalam membangun masyarakat yang maju (Laar, Deursen, Dijk, & Haan, 2017), tetapi juga dijadikan sebagai kesempatan untuk melatih dan mengembangkan keahlian dalam menciptakan keilmuan psikologi yang applicable (Vorobyeva & Ermakov, 2015).…”
Section: Gambar 1 Signifikansi Mata Kuliah Metodologiunclassified
“…Business students in institutions of higher learning are usually exposed to many forms of research methods trainings which include focus group discussions, case studies, surveys, projective techniques, and statistical methods, among others (Fedotova, 2013;Vorobyeva & Ermakov, 2015). Therefore, it is useful for business students in institutions of higher learning to have understanding regarding the degree to which the research methods employed in their relevant studies give them latitude to make valid and reasonable conclusions and inferences pertaining to cognate research findings in the field of business management/administration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%