2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcription factor binding sites detection by using alignment-based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where, TFBSs range from 6 to 20 base pairs in length and have 5 to 10 instances with 60% to 90% identity. Furthermore, AmotiF gained the highest score in the famous assessment provided by Tompa et al (2005), as stated by Mahdevar et al (2012). By investigating TFBSs of S. cerevisiae Promoter Database (SCPD) (Zhu and Zhang, 1999) and TFBSs of Escherichia coli Database (RegulonDB) (Salgado et al, 2004), we have found that TFBSs positions are far from being random, to be exact, TFBSs positions have little standard deviation: 28% of maximum value, which is consistent with the results of Beer and Tavazoie (2004).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Where, TFBSs range from 6 to 20 base pairs in length and have 5 to 10 instances with 60% to 90% identity. Furthermore, AmotiF gained the highest score in the famous assessment provided by Tompa et al (2005), as stated by Mahdevar et al (2012). By investigating TFBSs of S. cerevisiae Promoter Database (SCPD) (Zhu and Zhang, 1999) and TFBSs of Escherichia coli Database (RegulonDB) (Salgado et al, 2004), we have found that TFBSs positions are far from being random, to be exact, TFBSs positions have little standard deviation: 28% of maximum value, which is consistent with the results of Beer and Tavazoie (2004).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Certainly, many computationally TFBSs discovery methods are available; for an overview of these methods see (MacIsaac and Fraenkel, 2006;Tompa et al, 2005). Among them, AmotiF tool (Mahdevar et al, 2012) has good sensitivity and specificity, runs fast, and is planned to find overrepresented pattern with respect to the biological facts about TFBSs (See Mahdevar et al (2012) for more details about this method). Therefore, we have chosen AmotiF tool to find TFBSs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations