2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptomic response of Escherichia coli O157 isolates on meat: Comparison between a typical Australian isolate from cattle and a pathogenic clinical isolate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2020) and King et al . (2019). Briefly, the salmons were washed thoroughly and preliminary disinfected with ethanol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2020) and King et al . (2019). Briefly, the salmons were washed thoroughly and preliminary disinfected with ethanol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They identified several genes that were differentially expressed between HUS-producing STEC (higher level) and non-HUS STEC, including nleB. A number of factors have been postulated to account for differential expression between isolates, including differences in DNA sequence, in the number of gene copies and in specific transcriptional regulators (de Gouw et al, 2014;Roberfroid et al, 2016;King et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. coli O157:H7 strongly tolerates many food-related environmental stresses, such as acid stress, low temperatures, osmotic stress, and poor nutrition [3]. Any food and beverage that may contact animal feces is a potential source of E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks that significantly contaminate beef [4,5]. Thus, many researchers are currently trying to find antimicrobials to control E. coli O157:H7 and other pathogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%