1998
DOI: 10.1115/1.2834895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transducers for Dynamic Measurement of Spine Neural-Space Occlusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total range of the transducer was from its nominal cross-sectional outside tubing area of 198.6 mm 2 down to 70.6 mm 2 , representing total occlusion of the tubing of 64%. The resolution of the SCOT was 75% of full scale (Raynak et al, 1998, Nuckley et al, 2002. The 24 specimens were divided into four experimental groups (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The total range of the transducer was from its nominal cross-sectional outside tubing area of 198.6 mm 2 down to 70.6 mm 2 , representing total occlusion of the tubing of 64%. The resolution of the SCOT was 75% of full scale (Raynak et al, 1998, Nuckley et al, 2002. The 24 specimens were divided into four experimental groups (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of maximum SCOT occlusion was compared to the injury level on X-rays. (Raynak, 1998). A plastic tubing is inserted into the spinal canal and filled with saline as the electrical resistance media.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Sylgard silicone surrogate cord developed by Bilston et al was designed to match the mechanical properties of the human ex vivo spinal cord in tension (Bilston et al, 1993;Bilston and Thibault, 1997). A sylastic tube spinal canal occlusion transducer developed by Raynak et al (1998) was designed to measure neural space occlusion, but not to mimic the mechanical properties of the cord. These former surrogate cords have been designed to measure canal occlusion and to evaluate spinal cord biomechanics under a single direction of loading (Bilston and Thibault, 1996;Pintar et al, 1996;Raynak et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is needed to correlate loading conditions and fracture patterns with the mechanical impairment of the spinal cord [2]. Several studies investigated the dynamic events occurring during the replication of burst type fractures [3][4][5][6] while other researchers developed spinal canal occlusion sensors in an attempt to estimate the transient spinal cord compression occurring during the trauma [5,[7][8][9][10]. However, there is no published technology allowing the quantification of the internal strain occurring within the spinal cord during in vitro replication of the trauma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%