2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation and fate of natural estrogens and their conjugates in wastewater treatment plants: Influence of operational parameters and removal pathways

Abstract: a b s t r a c tNatural estrogens (NEs) discharged from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have drawn great attention because of their potential risks to aquatic ecosystems. However, neglect of the conjugated natural estrogens (C-NEs) has caused large discrepancies among different studies on the removal of NEs in WWTPs. The present work investigated the transformation and fate of three NEs and six corresponding C-NEs along wastewater treatment processes. The removal efficiencies of the target estrogens (i.e., … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the prevalence of sulphates was observed, which was attributed to lower MDLs the sulphates possessed; additionally, the transformation of glucuronides to free estrogens was inferred in natural water while the sulphates were more recalcitrant to biodegradation induced by microorganisms, as reported prior to this study. 84…”
Section: Application To Environmental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the prevalence of sulphates was observed, which was attributed to lower MDLs the sulphates possessed; additionally, the transformation of glucuronides to free estrogens was inferred in natural water while the sulphates were more recalcitrant to biodegradation induced by microorganisms, as reported prior to this study. 84…”
Section: Application To Environmental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) were shown as an entry point into the environment of not only the estrogenic compounds like E2 and E1 (Khanal et al 2006 ; Ying et al 2009 ; Naldi et al 2016 ), but also of conjugated estrogens, excreted by humans mainly in the urine, that can all enter the aquatic environment at low ng/L concentrations (D’Ascenzo et al 2003 ; Reddy et al 2005 ; Kumar et al 2012 ; Liu et al 2015 ; Ma et al 2016 ; Naldi et al 2016 ; Ben et al 2017 ; Ma and Yates 2018 ).Glucuronide- or sulfate-conjugated estrogens are more polar than the corresponding free estrogens (Anstead et al 1997 ; Fang et al 2001 ) and consequently exhibit lower binding affinity for estrogen receptors rendering them biologically inactive (Desbrow et al 1998 ; Griffith et al 2014 ; Ma and Yates 2018 ). However, conjugated estrogens may be converted to the free form via hydrolysis by bacterial enzymes (Tyler and Routledge 1998 ; Bai et al 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of conjugate cleavage for the remobilisation of previously immobilised contaminants in biologically active matrices has been reported previously for similar matrices to those studied here. [60][61][62][63][64][65] There is apparent degradation for some compounds (e.g., ACE and OCR) but not for the majority of target substances (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Levels Of Cecs and Their Major Transformation Products In Bimentioning
confidence: 99%