Transforming relationship between neopatrimonial state and business for the sustainable development: Cluster Governance model

Abstract

Transforming relationship between neopatrimonial state and business in Russia are examined from the perspectives of sustainable development and “networkisation” of the business. We consider it on the basis of the innovation clusters formation as regional collaborative communities, the transition to Cluster Governance model as a new advanced form of the innovation process organisation, and environment factors of this transition. As a factor holding back this transition in Russia, the dominance of the “technocratic” approach to digitalisation of public administration is noted with an underestimation of the environment and human factors and the mechanisms of informal correction of power- bureaucratic decisions. In the context of ensuring the economic development sustainability the following effect is important: reducing cluster governance to traditional management due to the fact that the cluster is transformed into a vertically integrated holding, which is a reduction of the pluralistic and heterogeneous structure to a monistic and homogeneous one. The relevance of these risks to sustainable development of Russia is associated with the neopatrimonial nature of the current model of government with the high role of its informal component. The paper raises the question of measuring the influence of informal relations on the decision-making processes performing by government bodies.

Synergy and Correlation Optimization Analysis of Innovation System and Institutional Governance System from the Perspective of Cluster Ecosystem

“…In that regard, Coletti et al believe that institutional governance should be closely designed to increase the flexibility of leader decision-making [26]. Maracha et al pointed out that a new innovative industrial cluster ecosystem of advanced form, especially the digitization of governance, drives the collapse of cluster heterogeneous structures [27].…”

“…e preprocessing module parses its files to increase the matching degree of system T. So the cumulative effect formula of the system can be obtained (pseudocode lines [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”

“…When tracing the function to the source, it will be unable to match with the code assembly instruction set, which requires instruction exit and redetermination. pseudocode lines 32 and 37 show that the cluster system can be regarded as several subsystems (pseudocode lines [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Further, the existence of synergistic effect is greater than nonsynergistic effect, and there is an optimal solution for such synergy.…”