1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.1991.tb00036.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfusion‐induced immunosuppression and red cell clearance

Abstract: While blood transfusion is increasingly implicated in the aetiology of tumour recurrence, the mechanism of this effect is unclear. Cancer-bearing patients are known to have factors in their sera which depress the function of normal lymphocytes. It is possible that blood transfusion accentuates this natural suppression. An animal model was therefore developed to study the effect of blood transfusion on humoral immunosuppressive activity and its possible relationship to red cell clearance. WAG rats given a trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings prompted the hypothesis that blockade of the reticuloendothelial system by cell debris contained in RBC components probably causes increased postoperative infection after transfusion. This hypothesis is supported by the results of an animal model investigating clearance of damaged allogeneic or autologous RBCs and concomitantly increased levels of lymphocyte‐suppressive factors in plasma 35 . Although that study made no comment on storage time of transfused blood components, the hypothesis above might represent at least a contributing mechanism of immunomodulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These findings prompted the hypothesis that blockade of the reticuloendothelial system by cell debris contained in RBC components probably causes increased postoperative infection after transfusion. This hypothesis is supported by the results of an animal model investigating clearance of damaged allogeneic or autologous RBCs and concomitantly increased levels of lymphocyte‐suppressive factors in plasma 35 . Although that study made no comment on storage time of transfused blood components, the hypothesis above might represent at least a contributing mechanism of immunomodulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There is increasing evidence that allogeneic blood transfusion alters the host immune system and reduces the immune responsiveness (or immunocompetence) of the organism, thus predisposing a transfusion recipient to bacterial or viral infection. , ,65a Transient blockade of the reticuloendothelial system (RES, also known as the mononuclear phagocyte system; in charge, among others, of clearing the circulation of foreign particulate matter) by transfused material may result in decreased clearance of bacteria by phagocytic cells. A significantly increased, dose-dependent incidence of infectious complications and septicemia was found in transfused versus nontransfused surgical patients. A single unit of transfused allogeneic blood increased postoperative infections .…”
Section: Transfusion-mediated Immunosuppressive Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These unexpected findings indicate also that fresh autologous blood obtained by intraoperative‐ and postoperative RBC salvage might have some impact on immune response. One possible explanation for these findings might be the suggested influence of free Hb and even free iron on the function of the monocyte/macrophage system 15–17 . If this hypothesized mechanism is relevant for transfusion‐induced immunosuppression, the storage time of blood components would gain importance, because it determines the amount of apoptotic and necrotic WBCs, 18 as well as the amount of free Hb present at the time of transfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%