2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition in the nanoporous structure of iron oxides during the oxidation of iron nanoparticles and nanowires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
44
0
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
44
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…It was studied to a large extent experimentally in binary stoichiometric systems [1][2][3][4][5][6] and also theoretically [7][8][9][10][11]. From the experimental studies, it is evident that the formation of a hollow nanosphere of stoichiometric phase M p X q must be preceded by the formation of a sufficiently thick M p X q nanoshell on the metallic core of phase M. Moreover, it is also demonstrated experimentally that no M p X q hollow nanospheres are formed from larger M nanospheres, and the nanospheres with M core and M p X q shell represent stable objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was studied to a large extent experimentally in binary stoichiometric systems [1][2][3][4][5][6] and also theoretically [7][8][9][10][11]. From the experimental studies, it is evident that the formation of a hollow nanosphere of stoichiometric phase M p X q must be preceded by the formation of a sufficiently thick M p X q nanoshell on the metallic core of phase M. Moreover, it is also demonstrated experimentally that no M p X q hollow nanospheres are formed from larger M nanospheres, and the nanospheres with M core and M p X q shell represent stable objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8(b)). In our previous paper, we found out the experimental result supporting that the formation of the additional spherical nanovoids is closely correlated with the shrinkage of the cylindrical nanopore; the additional nanovoids appeared at 673 K, where the diameter of nanotubes started to decrease (Nakamura et al, 2009a). Furthermore, from the line profile of Fig There is a definite difference in morphology change during shirking between CuO and NiO, and Fe 3 O 4 ; additional nanovoids are introduced along the inner wall of the nanotubes only in the shrinking process of Fe 3 O 4 n a n o t u b e s .…”
Section: Transition From Iron Oxide Nanotube To Nanoporous Wiresmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, from the line profile of Fig There is a definite difference in morphology change during shirking between CuO and NiO, and Fe 3 O 4 ; additional nanovoids are introduced along the inner wall of the nanotubes only in the shrinking process of Fe 3 O 4 n a n o t u b e s . I t w a s r e p o r t e d i n o u r p r e v i o u s p a p e r s (Nakamura et al, 2008b) that a similar tendency can be seen in the shrinking process of hollow oxide nanoparticles; hollow CuO and NiO nanoparticles become solid particles without the formation of additional voids, whereas hollow Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles turn into solid γ-Fe 2 O 3 via a porous structure (Nakamura et al, 2009a). It should be pointed out, as mentioned above, that the phase transformation from Fe 3 O 4 to γ-Fe 2 O 3 proceeds when the formation of additional voids and the shrinkage of a cylindrical nanopore occur simultaneously while the crystal structure of CuO and NiO nanotubes remains unchanged in the process of shrinking.…”
Section: Transition From Iron Oxide Nanotube To Nanoporous Wiresmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Removal of core in the core shell NPs is an important parameter to make them hollow structures [15,16]. The formation of metal oxide hollow NPs is due to the coalescence of cation vacancies formed due to the difference in diffusion rates ( metal > oxygen ) of metal and oxygen after oxidation of metals while having noncoalesced vacancies after oxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%