2009
DOI: 10.12973/ejmste/75279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translating a “Relevance Imperative” into Junior Secondary Mathematics and Science Pedagogy

Abstract: Inquiries into the state of mathematics and science education in Australia express the need to make curriculum and teaching practices more relevant and meaningful to students' lives. This vision requires that teachers understand how relevance can enter the classroom in meaningful, appropriate, and subject-specific ways. In this paper I use interview data and classroom excerpts to explore junior secondary teachers' responses to what I call a "relevance imperative". The data shows that relevance is a multi-facet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the qualifications required for TPACK may not be perceived in the same way. Indeed, while Darby (2009) states that the integration of ICT in education is related to the culture of the subject area, including its structure and functioning, Karaseva Siibak and Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt (2015) explain that the use of digital technologies is related both to the subject area and to dominant pedagogical beliefs. For this reason, it has been stressed that studies should be conducted to show how TPACK differs according to subject areas (discipline, teaching field etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the qualifications required for TPACK may not be perceived in the same way. Indeed, while Darby (2009) states that the integration of ICT in education is related to the culture of the subject area, including its structure and functioning, Karaseva Siibak and Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt (2015) explain that the use of digital technologies is related both to the subject area and to dominant pedagogical beliefs. For this reason, it has been stressed that studies should be conducted to show how TPACK differs according to subject areas (discipline, teaching field etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICT competences may vary with their culture related to various disciplines (Karaseva Siibak & Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, 2015). This situation may result from the structure and functioning of the disciplines (Darby, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive dimension requires that teacher should know the limitations, theoretical structures and language of their subject, and how to set them to work in the learning and teaching process. Therefore culture says a lot about the methods of teacher's efforts to integrate ICT into the learning (Darby 2009). In this case, it can be said that teachers' of different subject areas have different views, applications and suggestions about ICT integration into the teaching and learning processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Öğretmenin BİT'i derslerine kaynaştırabilmesi için öğretim programındaki konuları öğretirken teknolojiyi pedagojik yöntemlerle işe koşması gerekir (Mishra ve Koehler, 2006). Dolayısıyla BİT'i derslere kaynaştırma öğretilecek içeriği kapsayan disiplinin yapısına ilişkin değerleri ve gelenekleri içeren konu alanı kültürüyle ilişkilidir (Darby, 2009). Bu nedenle, öğrencilerin sınıf-içinde gerçekleştirecekleri etkinliklerin ve öğretmenlerle ilişkilerinin birbirinden uzak disiplin alanlarındaki derslerde farklı, birbirine yakın disiplin alanlarındaki derslerde benzer olması beklenir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified