“…Therefore, the findings question the suitability of video-based perceptual-cognitive skill tests for studying perceptual-motor expertise (see Dicks et al, 2010 ), and this suggests that caution is warranted when using these tests for talent identification or to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. Alternatives to the paradigms employed in traditional laboratory studies have been provided by recent technological advances such as mobile eye tracking devices ( Van Maarseveen et al, 2016 ; Pluijms, Cañal-Bruland, Kats, & Savelsbergh, 2013 ), event-related visual occlusion goggles ( Mann et al, 2010 ; Oudejans, van de Langenberg, & Hutter, 2002 ), and virtual reality ( Bideau et al, 2010 ; Correia, Araújo, Cummins, & Craig, 2012 ). In order to accurately capture the perceptual-motor performances of athletes, we suggest using in situ research designs so that the task constraints represent as accurately as possible the natural performance setting of the athlete and actual movement responses are required.…”