1979
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)86791-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation and stability of rat liver messenger RNA for alpha 2 mu-globulin in Xenopus oocyte. The role of terminal poly(A).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 80S peak, which accumulated in cycloheximide-treated but not untreated extracts (data not shown), is indicated by an arrow. levels of translational initiation than occur in reticulocyte extracts and give support to the notion that the extent of the difference between poly(A)+ and poly(A)-mRNAs will be dependent on the extent of reinitiation (15,16,21,61). Although the differences between poly(A)+ and poly(A)-mRNAs are substantially smaller in vitro than they are in some in vivo systems, we are confident that the differences are significant because (i) the magnitude of the poly(A) effect in vitro is equivalent to that obtained by differences in mRNA capping (Fig.…”
Section: Gradients Arrows Indicate the Position Of The 80s Peak (A) Capped Poly(a)+ Rbg (68 A's) Versus Capped Poly(a)+ Rbg (68 A's); (B)supporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 80S peak, which accumulated in cycloheximide-treated but not untreated extracts (data not shown), is indicated by an arrow. levels of translational initiation than occur in reticulocyte extracts and give support to the notion that the extent of the difference between poly(A)+ and poly(A)-mRNAs will be dependent on the extent of reinitiation (15,16,21,61). Although the differences between poly(A)+ and poly(A)-mRNAs are substantially smaller in vitro than they are in some in vivo systems, we are confident that the differences are significant because (i) the magnitude of the poly(A) effect in vitro is equivalent to that obtained by differences in mRNA capping (Fig.…”
Section: Gradients Arrows Indicate the Position Of The 80s Peak (A) Capped Poly(a)+ Rbg (68 A's) Versus Capped Poly(a)+ Rbg (68 A's); (B)supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Previous experiments have also utilized purified or synthetic mRNAs to evaluate a possible role for poly(A) in translation (15)(16)(17)21). Our experiments differ from these earlier studies in that we used synthetic mRNAs which closely resemble their in vivo counterparts, i.e., (i) the poly(A)+ mRNAs used here contain homogeneous poly(A) tracts equivalent to steady-state lengths, (ii) the poly(A)+ and poly(A)-mRNAs used here differ only in poly(A) sequences and not other mRNA sequences, and (iii) both the poly(A)+ and the poly(A)-mRNAs used in this study lack additional [non-poly(A)] homopolymeric tracts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“….~~~~~~~-w 13 _~~~~-1.25 250 350 45 The possibility that poly(A) tail lengths directly determine mRNA stabilities has been suggested by microinjection experiments with adenylated and deadenylated mRNAs (17,29,46,56) and by experiments with cordycepin-treated cells (90). However, similar microinjection experiments with different poly(A)+ and poly(A)-mRNAs (16,27,48,73) and other experimental approaches (38,58,71,84) do not support this hypothesis. Our measurements of the poly(A) tail lengths associated with individual stable and unstable D. discoideum mRNAs (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…mRNA decay rates versus poly(A) tail length. The possibility that poly(A) tail lengths directly determine mRNA stabilities has been suggested by some experiments (28,56,86,90), but not by others (16,38,58,71,84). To evaluate whether poly(A) tail lengths influence mRNA decay rates in D. discoideum amoebae, we have compared the steady-state poly(A) tail length of seven mRNAs with different half-lives (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%