Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Linguistic Validation of the FACE-Q Questionnaire for Brazilian Portuguese

Bustillo, Adriana Margarita Buelvas; Lobato, Rodolfo Costa; Luitgards, Bruno Ferreira; Camargo, Cristina Pires; Gemperli, Rolf; Ishida, Luiz Carlos

doi:10.1007/s00266-019-01399-1

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Their study is relevant and has merit, as it involved the translation and linguistic validation of an instrument composed of 353 questions. However, the cross-cultural adaptation may have been biased, since only 7 patients were enrolled, of a wide age range, without gender specification, submitted to surgical or non-surgical facial cosmetic procedures (17). The present study complements the study of Bustillo et al by providing further cross-cultural validation of the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall Scale, performed in a significantly larger sample (n=57) of rhytidoplasty patients selected with very strict eligibility criteria.…”

Section: ' Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…Recently, Bustillo et al published the Brazilian version of the entire FACE-Q Questionnaire (17). Their study is relevant and has merit, as it involved the translation and linguistic validation of an instrument composed of 353 questions.…”

Section: ' Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recently, Bustillo and colleagues published the Brazilian version of the complete FACE-Q questionnaire (17), which they tested in patients who had undergone any surgical or nonsurgical facial cosmetic procedure. The current study provides cross-cultural validation of the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall Scale for a significant sample of Brazilian rhytidoplasty patients.…”

Section: ' Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cross-cultural validation of the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall Scale (FACE-Q SFAOS) in Brazilian rhytidoplasty patients

Gama

Rossetto

Brito

et al. 2020

Clinics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to culturally validate the FACE-Q-Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall Scale (Face-Q SFAOS) in a population of Brazilian rhytidoplasty patients. METHOD: Authorization for the translation and validation of the questionnaire was obtained from the FACE-Q SFAOS distribution rights holders. The FACE-Q SFAOS was translated and then back-translated. For cultural validation, a total of 57 women were selected 5 to 8 months after undergoing rhytidoplasty. Twenty of them participated in the cultural adaptation, 30 participated in the reproducibility analysis, and 57 participated in the construct validation. RESULTS: The analysis identified two factors (general appearance and face geometry) that exhibited excellent internal consistency. The total satisfaction score, which comprised nine items, also presented excellent internal consistency. Good reproducibility was found for Overall Appearance, Geometry and Total. There was a difference in the satisfaction means (total and factors) between procedure locations; patients undergoing frontal, upper eyelid and lower eyelid procedures were less satisfied than those who did not undergo such procedures. Satisfaction was higher with geometry than with overall face appearance. CONCLUSION: The FACE-Q SFAOS was adapted to the cultural context of Brazilian rhytidoplasty patients and was reproducible, and the scale exhibited face, content and construct validity.

show abstract

Section: ' Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: ' Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: ' Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cross-cultural validation of the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall Scale (FACE-Q SFAOS) in Brazilian rhytidoplasty patients

Gama

Rossetto

Brito

et al. 2020

Clinics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…10 Recently, this tool has been translated and validated for application in other languages. 11 Similarly, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) is a scale for functional assessment of nasal obstruction, Vitor Penteado Figueiredo Pagotto, MD* Rafael Mamoru Carneiro Tutihashi, MD † Renan Diego Americo Ribeiro, MD* Giulia Godoy Takahashi, MD* Cristina Pires Camargo, MD, PhD ‡ Fábio de Freitas Busnardo, MD, PhD* † Rolf Gemperli, MD, PhD* Introduction: Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is responsible for high morbidity and mortality, resulting in a high cost to the health system. The nose is the leading region affected by this type of tumor and may need reconstruction by tissue transfer.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of FACE-Q and NOSE in Nasal Reconstruction with Paramedian Frontal Flap after Skin Cancer Resection

Pagotto

Tutihashi

RIBEIRO

et al. 2021

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is responsible for high morbidity and mortality, resulting in a high cost to the health system. The nose is the leading region affected by this type of tumor and may need reconstruction by tissue transfer. The paramedian forehead flap (PFF) is one of the main options used, and the factors that influence the result should be studied. The FACE-Q questionnaire allows the assessment of appearance, quality of life, and side effects related to the procedure, whereas the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation questionnaire enables the nose function evaluation. Methods: This study evaluates nasal reconstruction with a PFF after resection of NMSC with the FACE-Q questionnaire and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation. Spearman Rank correlation coefficient tests between the questionnaire results and patients' characteristics were performed. Results: The questionnaires were completely answered by 49 patients who underwent this reconstruction between 2011 and 2019 in a cancer center. The patients’ evaluations demonstrate high satisfaction with appearance, quality of life, side effects, and function. Completing reconstruction under 6 months was associated with a higher quality of life among patients ( P = 0.002). Reconstruction of lining or scaffold, moment of flap division, complications, and number of operations did not show an association. Conclusion: This study suggests that the PFF is a reliable option for nasal reconstruction. Identifying the total reconstruction time as an impact factor on patients’ quality of life should be considered when planning treatment.

show abstract

“…The translation process and cross-cultural adaptation were conducted in accordance with international translation recommendations by Q-Portfolio with respect to the ISPOR and WHO guidelines and are comparable to the methods other teams used for the translation of the FACE-Q. [18][19][20][21]…”

Section: Translation Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dutch Translation and Validation of the FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

FACE-Q was developed by Klassen et al in 2010 as a validated psychometric evaluation instrument for patients undergoing aesthetic surgery. The aim of this study was to translate, adapt, and validate the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module into a Dutch version of the FACE-Q questionnaire conceptually equivalent to the original English version. “Satisfaction with nose” and “satisfaction with nostrils” questionnaires were used and translated from English into Dutch. The translation process and cross-cultural adaptation were conducted in accordance to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and World Health Organization guidelines. Psychometric validation was performed prospectively on a patient cohort of 30 patients. Each step in the translation process allowed us to make changes to achieve a conceptual translation equivalent to the original version. Psychometric validation revealed highly significant values for internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and responsiveness. The use of international translation guidelines, with a strict translation–back-translation process, led to a Dutch version of the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module. Statistical validation proved the conceptual correspondence with the original English version. The FACE-Q rhinoplasty module is an adequate instrument for determining successful aesthetic surgery based on patient satisfaction. This tool measures twofold: the degree of success with respect to the patient as well as being an assessment tool for the surgeon. We hope this will provide an additional tool to the clinician evaluating the Dutch-speaking rhinoplasty patient.

show abstract

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Linguistic Validation of the FACE-Q Questionnaire for Brazilian Portuguese

Cited by 11 publications

References 33 publications

Cross-cultural validation of the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall Scale (FACE-Q SFAOS) in Brazilian rhytidoplasty patients

Cross-cultural validation of the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall Scale (FACE-Q SFAOS) in Brazilian rhytidoplasty patients

Application of FACE-Q and NOSE in Nasal Reconstruction with Paramedian Frontal Flap after Skin Cancer Resection

Dutch Translation and Validation of the FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About