2008 IEEE International Conference on Web Services 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icws.2008.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transparent Reputation Management for Composite Web Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, eight studies utilise offline monitoring because they gather data while the service executes but use the data later. In addition to this, four of these studies ( [35,39,40,42]) perform a technique known as feedback based monitoring. In these four studies, monitoring is based on client feedback because the client monitors his executions and sends information about them to a registry or a broker.…”
Section: Testing Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, eight studies utilise offline monitoring because they gather data while the service executes but use the data later. In addition to this, four of these studies ( [35,39,40,42]) perform a technique known as feedback based monitoring. In these four studies, monitoring is based on client feedback because the client monitors his executions and sends information about them to a registry or a broker.…”
Section: Testing Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all of these studies (13) test services with respect to non-functional properties and only three test functional properties. Here again, there are two studies ( [35,48]) that address the testing of both functional and non-functional properties. The results represented in Table 6 show that although there are a relevant number of studies (12) that test functional properties to detect faults, there is a lack of studies that make a decision about the dynamic binding based on the results of the functional tests (only three studies).…”
Section: Objective Of the Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework can be integrated into a service reputation management framework [9] or a service search engine, namely Seekda 3 to help users selecting the best services. In this paper we will introduce candidate algorithms for the above steps to evaluate quality of an example service and analyze in details computational complexity of these algorithms to demonstrate the possibility of our approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous work [4,14] shows that these two kinds of events can be sufficient for experimenting with middleware extensions that deal with services rebinding/tuning or reputation reporting. However, new event types may be defined by extending the meta-model and defining a plug-in for SOABench.…”
Section: Servicementioning
confidence: 99%