The Anterior Cruciate Ligament 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-38962-4.00138-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Tibial Eminence Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other arthroscopic fixation techniques have also been reported, including bioabsorbable nails, percutaneous K-wires, sutures with 1 anchor, and suspensory button fixation. [ 1 , 10 – 12 , 21 ] Overall, clinical results with such procedures have been excellent. However, most of these are time consuming and technically demanding, require removal of hard tissues, and can sometimes lead to complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other arthroscopic fixation techniques have also been reported, including bioabsorbable nails, percutaneous K-wires, sutures with 1 anchor, and suspensory button fixation. [ 1 , 10 – 12 , 21 ] Overall, clinical results with such procedures have been excellent. However, most of these are time consuming and technically demanding, require removal of hard tissues, and can sometimes lead to complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different arthroscopic fixation techniques (materials) have been reported such as Kirschner wires, cannulated screws, pull-out sutures, sutures with anchors, metallic sutures, intra-articular buttons, bioabsorbable nails, Herbert screws, and tight-rope fixations. [ 1 , 8 10 ] However, some of these techniques introduce risks of fracture fragment comminution, extension block by a screw head, implant breakage, loosening or migration, infection, and nonunion. In addition, most of them are technically demanding and require removal of hard implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of dynamic compression plates for fracture repair has several disadvantages, such as delayed union, existence of microscopic fracture gaps and cortical bone loss after plate removal [ 30 ]. For instance, Mardam-Bey et al reported outcomes for tibial eminence fracture repair using screw fixation on dynamic compression plates, reporting that 20% of patients show anterior screw relaxation following treatment and 10% of patients experience rotational instability and loss of motion [ 33 ].…”
Section: Current Surgical Approaches For Fracture Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%