2017
DOI: 10.2172/1355758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Research & Development - A Physics Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found we retained the most data of energy filter threshold greater than 5 as well as model performance with data filtered between 1 Hz and 5 Hz using a Butterworth filter. Maceira et al (2017) showed that seismo-acoustic wave amplitude -yield relationship can vary and depends on many factors such as emplacement geologic conditions and depth. To address such amplitude variations, we applied a signal normalization function to the data before feeding them into the CNN classifier.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found we retained the most data of energy filter threshold greater than 5 as well as model performance with data filtered between 1 Hz and 5 Hz using a Butterworth filter. Maceira et al (2017) showed that seismo-acoustic wave amplitude -yield relationship can vary and depends on many factors such as emplacement geologic conditions and depth. To address such amplitude variations, we applied a signal normalization function to the data before feeding them into the CNN classifier.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust global nuclear blast detection is essential for international regulatory bodies such as the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) and the Air Force Technical Applications Center (AFTAC) to monitor the near-worldwide moratorium on nuclear explosive testing and eventually to verify the compliance of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). Although the CTBTO uses a variety of data including continuous seismic, acoustic, hydro-acoustic signals, and radionuclide data, seismic methods have proved to be the most robust and rapid for the purpose of detecting, locating and discriminating underground nuclear blasts from natural earthquakes and other near surface seismic signals (Maceira et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of seismic data monitoring in nuclear explosion monitoring is to accurately and reliably detect seismic or explosion events from ambient noises. This processing mainly involves detection, association, location, discrimination, and magnitude/yield estimation [2]. The IMS of CTBTO includes 50 primary seismic stations and 120 auxiliary seismic stations, most of which record seismic signals by the seismic array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust global underground nuclear explosion (UNE) detection is essential for international regulatory bodies such as the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) and the Air Force Technical Applications Center (AFTAC) to monitor the near-worldwide cessation of nuclear explosive testing and eventually to verify the compliance of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). Although the CTBTO uses a variety of data including continuous seismic, acoustic, hydro-acoustic signals, and radionuclide data, seismic methods have proved to be the most robust and rapid for the purpose of detecting, locating and discriminating UNEs from natural earthquakes and other near surface seismic signals (Maceira et al, 2017). Improved and continued development of underground explosion detection using seismic methods is imperative given that UNE testing is the most likely scenario for all future testing as it allows for control of radioactive explosive products (Maceira et al, 2017).Existing methods for seismic detection and discrimination include beamforming, template matching, waveform autocorrelation, ratio of body to surface wave magnitudes, and P to S wave amplitude ratio calculations (Bowers…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%