2022
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202270298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triclinic Metamaterials by Tristable Origami with Reprogrammable Frustration (Adv. Mater. 43/2022)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, the rational design of metamaterials with exceptional properties has relied on intuition and inspiration from nature [52,53] or ancient arts. [54,55] However, in order to enable a systematic approach for tailoring the properties of metamaterials, a comprehensive understanding of their classification and size-dependent characteristics is essential. This study has primarily focused on exploring these key aspects, aiming to provide insights into the systematic design of metamaterials rather than relying solely on intuition or inspiration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the rational design of metamaterials with exceptional properties has relied on intuition and inspiration from nature [52,53] or ancient arts. [54,55] However, in order to enable a systematic approach for tailoring the properties of metamaterials, a comprehensive understanding of their classification and size-dependent characteristics is essential. This study has primarily focused on exploring these key aspects, aiming to provide insights into the systematic design of metamaterials rather than relying solely on intuition or inspiration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deployment of all these patterns does not involve geometric frustration, [ 46,47 ] a phenomenon occurring when incompatible geometric constraints impede the deformation of an object under a set of applied forces; in the realm of kirigami, geometric frustration appears as local disordered deployments caused by incompatible geometric restrictions, such as local deformation of panels due to slit geometry that violates rigid deployable constraints [ 48 ] and out‐of‐plane morphing due to nonuniform strains in nonperiodic patterns. [ 37 ] This focus has so far excluded the investigation of exotic modes of deformation, e.g., anisotropic and inhomogeneous deployment, [ 49 ] pattern formation of complex order, [ 47 ] and history‐dependent mechanical computation [ 50 ] among other functionalities, that—on the other hand—have been studied in frustrated soft metamaterials. The concept of geometric frustration in soft kirigami and its interplay with slit symmetry remains elusive and calls for further investigation due to its promise to unlock shape transformations and properties thus far unattainable in kirigami metamaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] One key strategy to attain snap-through instability is to rationally design the metamaterial architecture, which can span a wide range of structural concepts, from the von Mises Truss, [25,26] inclined or curved beams, [10,11,13] shells and domes, [27,28] to origami and kirigami. [24,[29][30][31][32] Existing works have so far focused on harnessing the negative incremental stiffness provided by these structural concepts to endow a metamaterial with distinct functionalities at the concept stage of design. Once manufactured, however, their as-built architecture is permanently imprinted with snapthrough characteristics that cannot be changed in service through a mechanical input unless a field-responsive material is used and triggered by the application of an external physical field, such as a thermal or electromagnetic stimulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%