1982
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210730220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple Crystal Diffractometer Investigations of Imperfections in Silicon Crystals with Laue-Case Diffraction

Abstract: Possibilities of triple crystal diffractometer measurements with Laue‐case diffraction of parallel (+n, −n, +n) setting are investigated. Based on a theoretical description the intensity distribution of TCD curves is discussed. Calculated and experimental results of perfect crystals are presented. The diffuse scattering of microdefects in silicon crystals is measured near the reciprocal lattice point with CuKα and MoKα radiation in the Laue case and for comparison in the Bragg case. Despite of some disadvantag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing defect size leads to a restriction of the Huang scattering to the immediate vicinity of the Bragg peak. In this case it is necessary to use a double-crystal diffractometer or better a triple-crystal diffractometer in parallel position to increase the resolution and to measure the distribution of diffuse scattering in an integral (Thomas, Baldwin & Dederichs, 1971;Patel, 1975) or in differential geometry (Larson & Schmatz, 1974;Iida & Kohra, 1979;Iida, 1979;Zaumseil & Winter, 1982b), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing defect size leads to a restriction of the Huang scattering to the immediate vicinity of the Bragg peak. In this case it is necessary to use a double-crystal diffractometer or better a triple-crystal diffractometer in parallel position to increase the resolution and to measure the distribution of diffuse scattering in an integral (Thomas, Baldwin & Dederichs, 1971;Patel, 1975) or in differential geometry (Larson & Schmatz, 1974;Iida & Kohra, 1979;Iida, 1979;Zaumseil & Winter, 1982b), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) where C; (i = 1, 2, 3) describes the reflection curves of the three crystals following the dynamical theory of X-ray diffraction, K is a proportionality factor that includes the source intensity, geometrical parameters etc. Both polarization states have to be considered (Zaumseil & Winter, 1982). Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Conditions For Tcd Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the curves in Fig. 3 a and b represent the "diffuse" peaks in triple crystal rocking curves [18]. Variable A6, which corresponds t o the angular position of the third crystal, is connected with the angular deviation CL of the wave falling on the crystal with defects (i.e.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the angular intensity distribution of the diffracted wave is modified near A 6 = a by the coherent transmittivity and has a minimum, and in the case of the transmitted wave there is a maximum a t A 6 = oc owing to the maximum of the coherent reflectivity. Unfortunately, these dynamical effects are hardly to observe experimentally, since their positions are the same as the positions of the pseudopeaks in triple crystal rocking curves [18]. The angular intensity distributions have maxima a t A 6 = a ( lcos 26) z 0, which correspond t o the maxima of the diffuse peaks following from the kinematical theory [18].…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%