2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00579.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trophic level scales positively with body size in fishes

Abstract: Aim The existence of a body size hierarchy across trophic connections is widely accepted anecdotally and is a basic assumption of many food-web models. Despite a strong theoretical basis, empirical evidence has been equivocal, and in general the relationship between trophic level and body size is often found to be weak or non-existent.Location Global (aquatic). MethodsUsing a global dataset for fishes (http://www.fishbase.org), we explored the relationship between body size and trophic position for 8361 fishes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

14
163
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
14
163
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It is consistent with the tendency for fisheries to first exploit species at higher trophic levels and subsequently move down the food web (10), as animals at higher trophic levels are typically larger than their counterparts at lower trophic levels (11). Size-biased vulnerabilities operate within species as well (12,13), reflecting a unique human propensity to cull the largest members of a population (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is consistent with the tendency for fisheries to first exploit species at higher trophic levels and subsequently move down the food web (10), as animals at higher trophic levels are typically larger than their counterparts at lower trophic levels (11). Size-biased vulnerabilities operate within species as well (12,13), reflecting a unique human propensity to cull the largest members of a population (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The preferential threat to large-bodied marine animals poses a danger to ecosystems disproportionate to the percentage of threatened species. Large-bodied animals are critical to ecosystem function because of their preferential position at the top of food webs (11,23) and importance to nutrient cycling (24) and bioturbation of sediments (25). Removal of large-bodied predators can also trigger trophic cascades affecting many other species [e.g., (26)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). Salmonids tend to swallow their prey whole (Hart 1997) and thus can show a strong positive relationship between body size and trophic position (Romanuk et al 2011). Thus, if δ 15 N values were driven by trophic position alone, we should expect a positive relationship between fish size and δ 15 N. That we saw a negative relationship suggested that variation in nitrogen isotopes may have been related to foraging location and driven by nitrogen sources at the base of the food web, rather than reflecting a trophic difference.…”
Section: Stable Isotopes and Fish Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…top predators and prey) are limited by energetic constraints, whereas low trophic levels (i.e. primary and secondary consumers) are limited by morphological constraints as mouth opening capacity (Romanuk et al 2010). We did not use the common ratio between mouth opening length and head length as a proxy of trophic level (Clifton & Motta 1998, Upeniece 2011) because none of the studied species were capable of jaw protrusion (Schaeffer & Rosen 1961, Alexander 1967, Motta 1984, Westneat 2004.…”
Section: Interpretative Palaeoecological Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eusthenopteron kurshi estimated from Eusthenopteron foordi; electronic supplementary appendix -Annex II). The variable eTL is used as a proxy of body size (Cohen et al 1993, Jennings et al 2001, Emmerson & Raffaelli 2004, Romanuk et al 2010. Mouth position, size, shape, dentition, protrusion degree and eye size are indicators of diet (Clifton & Motta 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%