2017
DOI: 10.1111/een.12384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trophic position and seasonal changes in the diet of the red wood antFormica aquiloniaas indicated by stable isotope analysis

Abstract: 1. Red wood ants are among the most numerous generalist predators and strongly affect the composition of arthropod communities in forest ecosystems. However, their trophic position remains poorly understood. Stable isotope analysis was applied to study the trophic position of Formica aquilonia and reveal seasonal changes in its trophic links with both myrmecophilous aphids and other invertebrates in a mixed forest of western Siberia.2. The δ15N values of F. aquilonia exceeded those of herbivores and aphids by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This measure of TP is less sensitive to outliers and small sample sizes than conventional measures of trophic ranges (max TP − min TP,Jackson, Inger, Parnell, & Bearhop, 2011). While interand intra-annual fluctuations in ant and plant isotopic signatures might be problematic for using plants as basal resources(Iakovlev, Novgorodova, Tiunov, & Reznikova, 2017;Mooney & Tillberg, 2005), we did not detect significant differences in ant signatures across sample years and assume plant signatures were also consistent.Nevertheless, we interpret TP and TR as relative measures of trophic position and trophic range, respectively. Estimating actual TP and TR would require sampling the basal resources concurrently with ants.To determine how harvest influenced the trophic position and trophic range of ants, we used separate general linear models (GLM) with harvest treatment (control/harvest), ant species, and a harvest treatment × species interaction as fixed effects, and within-site averaged TP and TR values as the response variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This measure of TP is less sensitive to outliers and small sample sizes than conventional measures of trophic ranges (max TP − min TP,Jackson, Inger, Parnell, & Bearhop, 2011). While interand intra-annual fluctuations in ant and plant isotopic signatures might be problematic for using plants as basal resources(Iakovlev, Novgorodova, Tiunov, & Reznikova, 2017;Mooney & Tillberg, 2005), we did not detect significant differences in ant signatures across sample years and assume plant signatures were also consistent.Nevertheless, we interpret TP and TR as relative measures of trophic position and trophic range, respectively. Estimating actual TP and TR would require sampling the basal resources concurrently with ants.To determine how harvest influenced the trophic position and trophic range of ants, we used separate general linear models (GLM) with harvest treatment (control/harvest), ant species, and a harvest treatment × species interaction as fixed effects, and within-site averaged TP and TR values as the response variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In mixed forests comprising conifers and deciduous broad-leaved birch in Europe and Asia, the red wood ant F. aquilonia is a dominant species. In spring the ants collect birch sap and nest-building materials, but predation on invertebrates is limited [78]. In sub-boreal deciduous forests of western Siberia, the F. aquilonia settlement capacity is lower than in boreal populations.…”
Section: Ants and Efn In Boreal Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amino acid content of EFN during flowering has not been studied, but an increase in amino acid content might make the ant distraction effect even stronger. In particular, ants require a high amino acid content when they are providing food for a queen [74], but nitrogen availability can be controlled by increasing the proportion of insect prey in their food [78].…”
Section: Usage Of Non-floral Carbohydrate Sources By Mutualistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations