Trunk Body Mass Index: A New Reference for the Assessment of Body Mass Distribution

Abstract

Background: Body mass index (BMI) has some limitations for nutritional diagnosis since it does not represent an accurate measure of body fat and it is unable to identify predominant fat distribution. Aim: To develop a BMI based on the ratio of trunk mass and height. Methods: Fifty-seven patients in preoperative evaluation to bariatric surgery were evaluated. The preoperative anthropometric evaluation assessed weight, height and BMI. The body composition was evaluated by bioimpedance, obtaining the trunk fat free mass and fat mass, and trunk height. Trunk BMI (tBMI) was calculated by the sum of the measurements of the trunk fat free mass (tFFM) and trunk fat mass (tFM) in kg, divided by the trunk height squared (m2)). The calculation of the trunk fat BMI (tfBMI) was calculated by tFM, in kg, divided by the trunk height squared (m2)). For the correction and adjustment of the tBMI and tfBMI, it was calculated the relation between trunk extension and height, multiplying by the obtained indexes. Results: The mean data was: weight 125.3±19.5 kg, height 1.63±0.1 m, BMI was 47±5 kg/m2) and trunk height was 0.52±0,1 m, tFFM was 29.05±4,8 kg, tFM was 27.2±3.7 kg, trunk mass index was 66.6±10.3 kg/m², and trunk fat was 32.3±5.8 kg/m². In 93% of the patients there was an increase in obesity class using the tBMI. In patients with grade III obesity the tBMI reclassified to super obesity in 72% of patients and to super-super obesity in 24% of the patients. Conclusion: The trunk BMI is simple and allows a new reference for the evaluation of the body mass distribution, and therefore a new reclassification of the obesity class, evidencing the severity of obesity in a more objectively way.

Causal associations between modifiable risk factors and isolated REM sleep behavior disorder: a mendelian randomization study

“…However, we found that increased trunk and whole-body fat-free mass were associated with in increased risk of iRBD. Compared to BMI, Fat-free mass, which represents trunk non-adipose tissue mass (trunk mass after subtracting the mass of fat tissue), provides an accurate depiction of body composition and serves as a valuable diagnostic tool for obesity ( 108 – 110 ). Although the mechanisms underlying these indicators remain unclear, they offer valuable guidance for identifying populations at high risk of developing iRBD.…”

C-peptide level as predictor of type 2 diabetes remission and body composition changes in non-diabetic and diabetic patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

“…We also hypothesized that body composition alterations induced by bariatric surgery could also differ between non-diabetic and diabetic patients, especially FFM or TM ( 29 ). Nevertheless, non-diabetic and diabetic patients presented the same alterations in body composition after surgery, with differences only in TM.…”

Comparative analysis of measuring the body fat percentage by anthropometric methods and bioimpedance

“…Some countries have developed their own standards N1, N2 [16,17,18]. However, there are shortcomings of this method that have been proven in various studies [19,20,21]. That is why there is a need to use some other anthropometric method of BFP determination, together with BMI.…”