1955
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60635-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor Viruses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the curves for groups given relatively small doses may be discontinuous as shown in the inset of Fig. 2 (Bryan & Beard, 1940;Cavalli & Magni, 1947;McKee, Rake, Donovick & Jambor, 1949;Beard, Sharp & Eckert, 1955: the latter discuss the treatment of these distributions). This implies that at a varying time after inoculation, which is related to the size of the dose, the hosts then surviving take longer to respond than would have been expected from the behaviour of those which had already responded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the curves for groups given relatively small doses may be discontinuous as shown in the inset of Fig. 2 (Bryan & Beard, 1940;Cavalli & Magni, 1947;McKee, Rake, Donovick & Jambor, 1949;Beard, Sharp & Eckert, 1955: the latter discuss the treatment of these distributions). This implies that at a varying time after inoculation, which is related to the size of the dose, the hosts then surviving take longer to respond than would have been expected from the behaviour of those which had already responded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While our data are not conclusive, future studies should examine the effects of different environmental temperatures on the efficiency of disease transmission and tumor development. The time lag for development of tumors caused by oncogenic viruses may also be influenced by infectious dose (Beard et al 1955). Presently we have no way to estimate the dose of infectious agent in our tumor extracts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the dose-response curves of bacterial and virus titrations have been extensively reviewed and discussed (Beard, Sharp & Eckert, 1955; Bryan, 1955; Isaacs, 1957;Lauffer & Price, 1945; Luria, 1940;Meynell & Stocker, 1957). In most infectivity titrations the log dose-probit response curves show a slope equal to or lower than 2 (Peto, 1953), this being approximately the slope of the first term of the Poisson distribution (the ' one-particle curve ').…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deviations from the one-particle curve are attributed to variations in host susceptibility which cause a flattening of the curves. This is particularly evident with agents such as the tumour viruses where variation in host susceptibility greatly affects the slope of dose-response curves (Bryan, 1954;Beard et al 1955). With bacteriophages, on the other hand, where host susceptibility is uniform, agreement with the one-particle curve is good (Feemster & Wells, 1933; Luria, H .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%