2013 CACS International Automatic Control Conference (CACS) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cacs.2013.6734135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning of nonlinear model predictive controller for the speed control of spark ignition engines

Abstract: This paper presents the speed control of meanvalue model of spark ignition (SI) engines by efficiently tuning nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC). The quadratic cost function in NMPC is tuned by applying the inverse optimality conditions on the linear quadratic regulator designed for the linearized model using the inverse linear quadratic (ILQ) regulator design method. This approach provides some tuning parameters that give a trade-off between the speed of the system's response and the magnitude of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might seem easy to define a performance index for the closed loop response as a similar index is defined for the OCP that is solved periodically, but there could be more aspects that are important for the control engineer that are not represented in the objective function of the OCP. Moreover, the OCP is usually nonlinear and is subject to inequality constraints, which make it impossible to find an analytical expression of the control law . In consequence, the performance index defined for the closed loop behavior of the system cannot be related explicitly with the tuning parameters of the controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It might seem easy to define a performance index for the closed loop response as a similar index is defined for the OCP that is solved periodically, but there could be more aspects that are important for the control engineer that are not represented in the objective function of the OCP. Moreover, the OCP is usually nonlinear and is subject to inequality constraints, which make it impossible to find an analytical expression of the control law . In consequence, the performance index defined for the closed loop behavior of the system cannot be related explicitly with the tuning parameters of the controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the OCP is usually nonlinear and is subject to inequality constraints, which make it impossible to find an analytical expression of the control law. 3 In consequence, the performance index defined for the closed loop behavior of the system cannot be related explicitly with the tuning parameters of the controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the final control law for throttle angle is determined by (12) when the optimal u * (t) is obtained. In this paper, the online optimization of MPC will be achieved by the C/GMRES algorithm, which can solve the linear equation instead of the Riccati differential equation in real time by combining the continuation method and the generalized minimal residual (GMRES) method [11].…”
Section: Mpc Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, a convenient tuning approach for MPC performance has the important practical significance with consideration of the time and cost. Recently, a tuning method for MPC performance from the viewpoint of the inverse linear quadratic (ILQ) regulator design is presented in [12] and [13], which becomes a inspiration for this paper. The remarkable advantage of the given method is that it can provide a single tuning parameter for the selection of the MPC weightings while guarantee the optimality of the feedback control system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%