2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning the band gap and the nitrogen content in carbon nitride materials by high temperature treatment at high pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently to literature data, [32,43] two diffraction peaks at ca. 13 • (210 plane) and 27 • (002 plane) are found for CN, which are attributed to the in-plane packing and inter-planar stacking of conjugated aromatic ring, respectively.…”
Section: Xrd Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistently to literature data, [32,43] two diffraction peaks at ca. 13 • (210 plane) and 27 • (002 plane) are found for CN, which are attributed to the in-plane packing and inter-planar stacking of conjugated aromatic ring, respectively.…”
Section: Xrd Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For treated CN, the UV-vis reflectance spectrum in Figure 7a shows the absorption edge around 488 nm, which is close to values which have previously been reported for carbon nitride [43]. The variation in light absorption with preparation route and treatment temperature is significant.…”
Section: Uv-vis Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…C 1s spectra yield peaks at 284.6, 286.8, and 288.4 eV; these can be ascribed to C–C, C–O, and C=O for the GO counterpart in the composite ( Figure 7 b). 39 It is evident that, except for the C–C peak, the other two oxygen-containing peaks have relatively low intensities, which indicate the successful hydrothermal reduction of GO, as had already been established by the Raman spectral analysis. Similarly, the N 1s spectrum in Figure 7 d has one peak at 398.1 eV.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Surprisingly, the band gaps were remarkably decreased to 1.25 eV in LCMGP after combining with PPy. Valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB) potentials of all samples were calculated using the following equations: 39 …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRS data recorded for IGS and ZAGS structures were changed over to absorption spectra by the Kubelka–Munk (K–M) theory. Their respective band gaps (E g ) were evaluated using the following equation 35 where α is the molar absorption coefficient determined as α = (1 – R ) 2 /2 R , h v is the incident light frequency, A is the proportionality constant, and E g is the band gap of the material. Table 1 illustrates the data from (α h v) 1/2 as a function of photon energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%