2022
DOI: 10.7758/rsf.2022.8.3.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Turning Their Back on Kids”: Inclusions, Exclusions, and the Contradictions of Schooling in Gentrifying Rural Communities

Abstract: 2002). Others have argued that smaller rural school environments have socially and academically protective factors that can have particularly positive outcomes for low-income youth (Coladarci 2006;Howley 1996). These imaginations of rural schooling are broadly consistent with understandings of rural places as bucolic, communitarian spaces, perhaps isolated from the wider world but with unique stocks of social capital (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each county has natural resources that are a draw for tourism: several coastal state parks in the case of Coos County and Moosehead Lake in the case of Piscataquis County. Unlike the communities that Sherman and Schafft (2022) document in this issue experiencing rural gentrification, the remote location relative to urban centers, interstate freeways, and airports of our study areas may limit that potential. This provides an opportunity for these manufacturingcentric places to consider a slower or more intentional growth trajectory, perhaps one that can mitigate some of the inequalities that may stem from higher amenity growth.…”
Section: Barriers To Rural Youth Engagement In School and Community A...mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Each county has natural resources that are a draw for tourism: several coastal state parks in the case of Coos County and Moosehead Lake in the case of Piscataquis County. Unlike the communities that Sherman and Schafft (2022) document in this issue experiencing rural gentrification, the remote location relative to urban centers, interstate freeways, and airports of our study areas may limit that potential. This provides an opportunity for these manufacturingcentric places to consider a slower or more intentional growth trajectory, perhaps one that can mitigate some of the inequalities that may stem from higher amenity growth.…”
Section: Barriers To Rural Youth Engagement In School and Community A...mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Along with our descriptive results (table A.1), this suggests that youth growing up in rural areas do not have significantly different educational or economic outcomes from urban youth so long as they migrate in adulthood. Indeed, qualitative evidence indicates that rural housing and economic development efforts disproportionately advantage wealthier inmigrants to rural areas, rather than long-time residents, and that schools are a key mechanism in this divergence (see Sherman and Schafft 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the lives of the low-income respondents, community leaders and their children were able to pursue higher education somewhat farther afield. Clay County, like many rural places, has experienced a brain drain (Carr and Kefalas 2009;Sherman and Schafft 2022;Bernsen et al 2022). Many community leaders expressed concern about this.…”
Section: Employ Mentmentioning
confidence: 99%