Modern Political Science 2009
DOI: 10.1515/9781400827763.259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twelve. Historicizing the New Institutionalism(s)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are so awful’ (Bulpitt 1988: 188). This is significant because it fits closely with the historical institutionalist claim – in contrast to rational choice institutionalism – that the motives and actions of actors are dependent on a particular institutional setting (Adcock et al 2007: 280). In contrast, rational choice theory takes preferences and motives as external and fixed.…”
Section: Statecraft As Historical Institutionalismmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…are so awful’ (Bulpitt 1988: 188). This is significant because it fits closely with the historical institutionalist claim – in contrast to rational choice institutionalism – that the motives and actions of actors are dependent on a particular institutional setting (Adcock et al 2007: 280). In contrast, rational choice theory takes preferences and motives as external and fixed.…”
Section: Statecraft As Historical Institutionalismmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The central assumptions of historical institutionalism, 2 writes Elizabeth Sanders (2006: 39), are that: ‘human political interactions should be studied (a) in the context of rule structures that are themselves human creations; and (b) sequentially, as life is lived, rather than to take a snapshot of those interactions at only one point in time, and in isolation from the rule structures (institutions) in which they occur’. Historical institutionalists distinguish themselves from rational choice institutionalists by emphasizing how the motives and actions of actors depend on the social-historical institutional setting (Adcock et al 2007: 280). They distinguished themselves from sociological institutionalists by having concerns about power at the forefront of the analysis.…”
Section: The Failures Of Historical Institutionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of genetic calculations were the same as in our previous study. GAUL [40] library was used for performing EA calculations. It was coupled with the CSA package developed in our group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the old institutionalism focuses on formal institutions and their interaction in political systems, the new institutionalism adopts a different understanding of ‘institutions’ and features an alternative research agenda. Whether or not the new institutionalism in its main variants is interpreted as a reaction to behaviourialism (Adcock et al, 2007; Hall and Taylor, 1996; March and Olsen, 1984), its exponents criticise ‘old institutionalism’ as ‘atheoretical’ (Steinmo et al, 1992: 2). Though the different new institutionalisms adopt quite different methodological approaches, they share what Rhodes (2011: 144) describes as a ‘modernist-empiricist epistemology’, where ‘institutions such as legislatures, constitutions, and civil services are treated as discrete objects that can be compared, measured, and classified’.…”
Section: Theoretical Approaches To Preference Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%