2000
DOI: 10.1086/308220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two‐dimensional versus Three‐dimensional Supernova Hydrodynamic Instability Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
80
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
12
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would favour a 2D simulation. However, developing turbulent structures and the occurring instabilities, which yield the break-up of the SN shell, are entirely different in 2D than in 3D (Elmegreen & Scalo 2004;Kane et al 2000). While turbulence in nature is an inherently 3D process, one might think of turbulent flows that are approximately 2D, in the sense that large scale coupling of eddies clearly exceeds the extension in one particular dimension.…”
Section: Comparison With Our Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would favour a 2D simulation. However, developing turbulent structures and the occurring instabilities, which yield the break-up of the SN shell, are entirely different in 2D than in 3D (Elmegreen & Scalo 2004;Kane et al 2000). While turbulence in nature is an inherently 3D process, one might think of turbulent flows that are approximately 2D, in the sense that large scale coupling of eddies clearly exceeds the extension in one particular dimension.…”
Section: Comparison With Our Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations have either been focused on the behavior of isolated bubbles or spikes [21][22][23] or or on multimode phenomena in thin, ablative layers relevant to inertial fusion. 24 There is to our knowledge only one exploration by detailed simulations in 3D of multimode RT at an embedded interface, 25 but it is a calculation for incompressible fluids at low Re.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Straightforward modeling of hydrodynamic instabilities has not produced enough mixing to explain them. 19,[58][59][60][61][62][63] Our past and planned experiments, in combination with simulations, should impact the consideration of instabilities as a potential explanation for the observations from SN1987A.…”
Section: Structure In Supernovae a Importance Of The Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spikes do experience less drag and reach higher velocities in 3D than in 2D. However, there are no 3D simulations of SN explosions, and the velocities remain too small to explain SN 1987A in 3D simulations 63,[73][74][75] and buoyancy-drag models 76,77 of isolated 3D spikes. Other existing studies of 3D RT instabilities, reviewed in Drake et al, 24 are of limited relevance for reasons discussed there.…”
Section: Structure In Supernovae a Importance Of The Workmentioning
confidence: 99%