Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Air monitoring was performed at a hazardous waste remedial action site. The protocol was designed to stress the activities at the drum bulking unit process, and emissions from that process. For the site, process and time during which the experiment was conducted, airborne vapor concentrations were all below permissible exposure limits.
Air monitoring was performed at a hazardous waste remedial action site. The protocol was designed to stress the activities at the drum bulking unit process, and emissions from that process. For the site, process and time during which the experiment was conducted, airborne vapor concentrations were all below permissible exposure limits.
The article contains sections titled: 1. Introduction 1.1. History 1.2. Differentiation of Tasks 1.3. Hazards in the Chemical Industry 1.4. General Outline of Goals 1.5. Experts and their Training 2. Legal Background 2.1. Laws and Regulations in Germany 2.1.1. State Legislation and Controls 2.1.2. Trade Associations 2.1.3. Company Occupational Safety System 2.1.4. Role of the Social Partner and Associations 2.1.5. Future Developments 2.2. Legal Requirements in Other European Countries 2.3. European Legislation 2.4. Regulations in the United States 3. Industrial Hygiene 3.1. Introduction and History 3.2. Requirements for an Effective Program 3.3. Objectives and Standards 3.4. Organization and Staff Management 3.5. Anticipation of Health Hazards 3.6. Occupational Exposure Assessment 3.6.1. Introduction 3.6.2. Characterization and Identification 3.6.3. Preliminary Evaluation and Prioritization (Qualitative Assessment) 3.6.4. Occupational Exposure Limits 3.6.5. Quantitative Assessment‐Occupational Hygiene Monitoring 3.6.6. Monitoring Planning and Strategy Definition 3.6.7. Sampling and Analysis; Data Quality Assurance 3.6.8. Sampling and Analysis Execution 3.6.9. Data Interpretation and Reporting; Record Keeping 3.7. Exposure Control Methods 3.7.1. General Concepts 3.7.2. Personal Protective Equipment 3.8. Physical Agents 3.9. Communication and Training 3.10. Industrial Hygiene in the United States 4. Occupational Medicine 4.1. Health Surveillance 4.1.1. Monitoring 4.1.2. Periodical Medical Examination 4.1.3. Evaluation and Interpretation of Data 4.1.4. Reporting Health Surveillance Results 4.1.5. Corrective Actions 4.2. Biological Monitoring 4.2.1. Basic Considerations 4.2.2. Prerequisites 4.2.3. Biological Media 4.2.4. Biological Occupational Limits 4.2.5. Interpretation of Biological Monitoring Data 4.3. Occupational Epidemiology 4.3.1. Introduction 4.3.2. Basic Requirements‐Data Collection 4.3.2.1. Data on Exposed Individuals in the Study Group 4.3.2.2. Technical Data on the Occupational Environment 4.3.3. Descriptive and Analytical Study Types 4.3.4. Usefulness of Occupational Epidemiological Studies 4.4. Ergonomics 4.4.1. Introduction; Definitions 4.4.2. Scope of Ergonomics 4.4.3. Stress Factors 4.4.4. Assessment and Testing Criteria 4.4.5. Objectives 4.5. Evaluation of Health Risks 4.5.1. Basic Considerations 4.5.2. Difficulties in Interpretation 4.5.3. Dose/Effect/Polymorphism 4.5.4. Hazard Identification 4.5.5. Risk Estimation 4.5.6. Risk Evaluation 4.5.7. Risk Limitation 4.6. Occupational Diseases and Work‐Related Illnesses 4.6.1. Introduction; Definitions 4.6.2. Occupational Diseases 4.6.3. Prevention 4.6.4. Compensation for Occupational Diseases 4.6.5. Trends 4.6.6. Work‐Related Illnesses 4.7. First Aid 4.8. Occupational Medicine in the United States 5. Acknowledgement
A method for qualitative estimation of the exposure at task level was used and validated with actual measurements in five small factories. The results showed that occupational hygienists were in general the most successful estimators. Plant supervisors and workers handled the estimation method less successfully because of more misclassification of the tasks. The method resulted, in general, in a classification of tasks in four exposure categories ranging from no exposure to high exposure. The exposure categories correlated positively with mean concentrations, but showed overlapping exposure distributions. This resulted in misclassification of the exposure for individual workers when a relatively large interindividual variability in exposure levels within an exposure category was present. The results show that this method can be used for workplace exposure zoning, but that the usefulness of the estimates for epidemiological purposes is not clear-cut and depends strongly on the actual exposure characteristics within a workplace. A combination of the qualitative exposure estimation method together with assessment of the exposure levels by measurements makes a rearrangement of tasks or individual workers possible and could improve the validity of this method for epidemiological purposes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.