1994
DOI: 10.1299/kikaib.60.4145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Phase Flow Distribution in Multipass Tube.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the liquid takeoff ratio is also related to the inlet quality. At any given inlet quality, the liquid take-off ratio reduces as Reynolds number increases at the same inlet quality, similar as the findings in Watanabe et al (1995) and Byun and Kim (2011). The vapor phase Froude number is also introduced into the distribution function to consider the effects of fluid properties.…”
Section: Figure 8: Coefficient Of Variation Decreases As Liquid Mass supporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the liquid takeoff ratio is also related to the inlet quality. At any given inlet quality, the liquid take-off ratio reduces as Reynolds number increases at the same inlet quality, similar as the findings in Watanabe et al (1995) and Byun and Kim (2011). The vapor phase Froude number is also introduced into the distribution function to consider the effects of fluid properties.…”
Section: Figure 8: Coefficient Of Variation Decreases As Liquid Mass supporting
confidence: 60%
“…The distribution functions of Watanabe et al (1995) and Byun and Kim (2011) relating liquid take-off ratio (ratio of liquid mass flow rate in the tube to liquid mass flow rate in the header immediately upstream) with vapor phase Reynolds number were proved to be good choice. The distribution function in this study is developed adopting the same parameters in the two-phase flow region in the header, i.e.…”
Section: Figure 8: Coefficient Of Variation Decreases As Liquid Mass mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(c) In the final evaluation method, the liquid and the vapor flow rates of the refrigerant at every individual branch tube after distributions are measured, respectively. In this case, the number of flow meters and liquid-vapor separators corresponding to the number of branch tubes are required (3,4) . This method is the most precise and gives enough information to understand the distribution phenomena.…”
Section: Previous Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal performance of the evaporator is greatly affected by the flow distribution characteristics of the multi-pass channel, and a uniform distribution of liquid to all the branches is desirable to the evaporator. Therefore, the two-phase flow distribution in multi-pass channels has been a major problem in development of compact heat exchangers, and many studies have been conducted on this subject in real refrigerant flow system [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] or in isothermal air-water flow system [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Recently, an extensive review of researches on the gas-liquid flow distributions in T-junctions and multi-pass channels was published by Lee et al [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%