2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Types and characteristics of ramp-related motor vehicle crashes on urban interstate roadways in Northern Virginia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Research has repeatedly shown that most highway crashes occur on off and on-ramps (McCartt et al 2004), mountainous areas (Ahmed et al 2011) andunder rainfall (Eisenberg, 2004) and icy conditions (Eisenberg and Warner, 2005). To control for this, we use the FARS data and estimate condition specific accident rates based on weather, road condition and other temporal restrictions (see Appendix for details).…”
Section: Traffic Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Research has repeatedly shown that most highway crashes occur on off and on-ramps (McCartt et al 2004), mountainous areas (Ahmed et al 2011) andunder rainfall (Eisenberg, 2004) and icy conditions (Eisenberg and Warner, 2005). To control for this, we use the FARS data and estimate condition specific accident rates based on weather, road condition and other temporal restrictions (see Appendix for details).…”
Section: Traffic Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than the above, research has been identified to focus on many aspects, including driver behavior, 19 waving area operations, 20 ramp configuration, 21 and crash analysis on freeway and ramps. 22 However, specific analysis on operational performance of different types of exit ramps has not conducted yet. Therefore, possible results and conclusions of this research are very helpful for exit ramp evaluation and selection, as well as some geometry design issues.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the previous crash prediction models, crash counts were usually aggregated over several years and the average crash count per year was considered the response variable (Bauer and Harwood, 1998;Bared et al, 1999;McCartt et al, 2004;Chen et al, 2009;Lord and Mannering, 2010;Liu et al, 2010;Washington et al, 2010). The reason for this is to reduce the random variation in the yearly crash data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%