Typological Features of Subjective Time Perception in the Context of Chronotopical Human Life

Bredun, E. V.; Krasnoryadtseva, Olga M.; Shcheglova, Eleonora A.

doi:10.17223/17267080/68/2

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Each person has his own attitude towards the past, the present, and the future. This attitude is a fundamental and unconscious process that influences one's perception of life events (Bredun et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peculiarities Of Attitude Towards Time Of Small Businesses Owners

Zabelina¹,

Artemeva²,

Kurnosova³

2021

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peculiarities Of Attitude Towards Time Of Small Businesses Owners

Zabelina¹,

Artemeva²,

Kurnosova³

2021

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Temporal Aspects of Lifestyle in the Kamchatka Territory

Kulik

Мазуркевич

2022

Vestn. Kemer. gos. univ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article introduces lifestyle and temporality as subjective time that includes characteristics of all life activity processes. The research involved residents of the Kamchatka Territory in the Russian Far East. A regression analysis provided equations that revealed the common temporal specialties of time perspectives in conjunction with lifestyle. The parameter of the past in the time perspective structure lacked coordination and combined negative and positive characteristics. It reflected a certain predetermination in life path construction with a deficit of activity where the subjects would have to oppose themselves to the world and environment. The parameter of the present revealed hedonism and fatalism that blocked future life planning and a life predetermination forms (I cannot control my life). Hedonistic present and fatalistic present were essentially different. However, the equation analysis showed a common element in the lifestyle structure that connected hedonistic and fatalistic present and defined the vector of human life. In the present, respondents relied on their social contacts as a friendly resource, on compromise as a life strategy, and dependence of inner and outer parameters as an inevitability of the world. The Future appeared to be an unstable construct with predominating fatalism. The temporal specialties of lifestyle revealed inability to resist and oppose the world, which manifested itself in inflexibility and inability to change a preplanned set of action. Respondents organized their life space by following some instructions and relied on them to make their behavior rational and organize their life. Neurotic conflicts and lifestyle disharmony manifested themselves as polar and incompatible aspects of assessment and description.

show abstract

Ambiguity Tolerance as a Component of Life Self-Fulfillment

Zlobina,

Krasnoryadtseva

2023

SibScript

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article introduces a new view of ambiguity tolerance / intolerance in post-non-classical psychology as a component of life self-fulfillment strategies. After more than seventy years of scientific circulation, ambiguity tolerance still remains a vague term supported by very few empirical data. Since tolerance and intolerance to ambiguity are associated with different psychological modalities, this phenomenon is multidimensional and complex. In this respect, tolerance to ambiguity is much more than a character trait: it is a life strategy. This study approached tolerance to ambiguity as a component of life self-fulfillment strategies. It involved 73 subjects (7 men; 66 women) aged 18–25. The list of psychometric instruments included T. V. Kornilova’s New Ambiguity Tolerance / Intolerance Questionnaire, R. Norton’s Measurement of Ambiguity Tolerance (MAT-50), E. V. Bredun’s Temporal Modality of Life Fulfillment, and I. O. Loginova’s method for lifeworld stability studies. The cluster analysis revealed four types of life self-fulfillment strategies: unconstructive, compensatory, contradictory (paradoxical), and constructive (stable). Life self-fulfillment strategies proved to depend on a combination of lifeworld stability, temporal modalities of life self-fulfillment, and tolerance to ambiguity. Since self-fulfillment strategies are unlikely to be limited to the four abovementioned strategies, their range can become a new research perspective.

show abstract

Typological Features of Subjective Time Perception in the Context of Chronotopical Human Life

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Peculiarities Of Attitude Towards Time Of Small Businesses Owners

Peculiarities Of Attitude Towards Time Of Small Businesses Owners

Temporal Aspects of Lifestyle in the Kamchatka Territory

Ambiguity Tolerance as a Component of Life Self-Fulfillment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About