2012
DOI: 10.1175/bams-d-12-00170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U.S. Climate Reference Network after One Decade of Operations: Status and Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both SURFRAD sites are located away from urban sources, so we expect them to be representative of the larger region. To verify consistency of SURFRAD trends against trends across the broader region, we compare the SURFRAD SWdn radiance data with pyranometer measurements from the US Climate Reference Network (USCRN; Diamond et al, 2013) SURFRAD also provides estimates of total clear-sky radiance using the all-sky observations, following the methods in Long and Ackerman (2000). Briefly, a power law model (Y = A × cos(θ )b) is fit, where the initial guess for Y is allsky SWdn, θ is the solar zenith angle, and A and b are the fitted coefficients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both SURFRAD sites are located away from urban sources, so we expect them to be representative of the larger region. To verify consistency of SURFRAD trends against trends across the broader region, we compare the SURFRAD SWdn radiance data with pyranometer measurements from the US Climate Reference Network (USCRN; Diamond et al, 2013) SURFRAD also provides estimates of total clear-sky radiance using the all-sky observations, following the methods in Long and Ackerman (2000). Briefly, a power law model (Y = A × cos(θ )b) is fit, where the initial guess for Y is allsky SWdn, θ is the solar zenith angle, and A and b are the fitted coefficients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assimilation results are evaluated using independent in situ measurements of surface and root-zone soil moisture from two sparse networks across the US: the US Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN; Schaefer et al, 2007) and the US Climate Reference Network (USCRN; Diamond et al, 2013;Bell et al, 2013). Surface soil moisture measurements are taken at approximately 5 cm depth.…”
Section: In Situ Soil Moisture Data and Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike biases in Tb innovations, the biases in the SM innovations are more stationary and do not depend on seasonal temperature variations. Therefore, the SM innovation biases are not corrected seasonally, but instead cumulative distribution function (CDF) matching between the observations and simulations is performed (Reichle and Koster, 2004) to reconcile the differences in long-term mean, variance, and higher moments, as in earlier retrieval assimilation studies Draper et al, 2012). The observed and simulated SM CDFs are computed for the entire study period, i.e., for 1 July 2010-1 May 2015, at each 36 km grid cell individually.…”
Section: Tb and Sm Innovation Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This network of 114 stations in the contiguous U.S. and more than 20 in Alaska and Hawaii provide climate quality records of SAT, precipitation, and soil moisture for climate monitoring (Figure 1). The USCRN [14] provides homogenous SAT, precipitation, and soil moisture measurements to traceable standards using triplicate instrument configurations for reducing uncertainty in the analysis of climate variability and change on a national scale. Measurements of SAT, wind speed at 1.5 m, relative humidity, and solar radiation are also made.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The USCRN hourly SAT data [14,18] is the base dataset for HIRS to be assessed against. This observational dataset is of very high quality and sufficient temporal scale for collocation of HIRS satellite SAT data.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%