1983
DOI: 10.1139/v83-015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ullmann condensation using copper or copper oxide as the reactant. Arylation of active hydrogen compounds (imides, amides, amines, phenol, benzoic acid, and phenylacetylene)

Abstract: Ullmann condensation using Cu or copper oxide as the reactant and using no base has been studied. Reactions of active N—H, O—H, and C—H compounds, RZH (imides, amides, amines, phenol, benzoic acid, and phenylacetylene), with mixtures of aryl halides and more than a stoichiometric amount of Cu or copper oxide (Cu2O or CuO) without addition of base lead to facile arylation of the active hydrogen compounds. In the arylation reaction Cu and copper oxides serve not only as the catalyst but also as the acceptor of h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate our findings, we have arbitrarily chosen PDE4D activity for this correlation, however since none of our compounds shows significant isozyme selectivity, the results are similar for PDE4A and PDE4B (graph not shown). The correlation between the potencies of our compounds (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) at the two binding sites is surprisingly good, giving a regression coefficient of 0.88 (S.D. 0.26; pϹ 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To illustrate our findings, we have arbitrarily chosen PDE4D activity for this correlation, however since none of our compounds shows significant isozyme selectivity, the results are similar for PDE4A and PDE4B (graph not shown). The correlation between the potencies of our compounds (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) at the two binding sites is surprisingly good, giving a regression coefficient of 0.88 (S.D. 0.26; pϹ 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…As can be seen from Fig. 1, rolipram is the only compound which clearly stands out, while SB-207499 (3) is indistiguishable in its behaviour from the rolipram derivatives (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). The data suggest that all of our compounds have a significantly improved l-PDE4/h-PDE4 ratio compared to rolipram and should therefore have a side effect profile similar to SB-207499.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations