2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(00)00028-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultimate bearing capacity of rock masses based on the modified Hoek–Brown criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10][11], in addition to being used in the pseudo-static procedure, can also be employed to determine the horizontal critical coefficient for any given load acting on the footing. This assumes that it acts only the horizontal component of the acceleration.…”
Section: Comparisons and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8][9][10][11], in addition to being used in the pseudo-static procedure, can also be employed to determine the horizontal critical coefficient for any given load acting on the footing. This assumes that it acts only the horizontal component of the acceleration.…”
Section: Comparisons and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified Hoek-Brown criterion has been used by several authors to calculate the bearing capacity of a strip footing resting on a horizontal rock surface in static conditions [7][8][9][10][11][12] and the stability of rock slopes both under static [13][14][15] and seismic conditions [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important studies were carried out to assess ultimate bearing capacity of rough strip footings rest upon rock masses [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Nevertheless, the authors are not aware of any published paper about the bearing capacity of two interfering foundations resting on a modified Hoek-Brown material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods for the bearing capacity can be mainly classified into the following four categories: (a) the slip line method [1][2][3][4][5][6], (b) the limit equilibrium method [7][8][9], (c) the limit analysis method [10][11][12][13], and (d) finite element or finite difference numerical techniques [14,15]. Among these methods, the slip line method has proved its usefulness in estimating the ultimate bearing capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these methods, the slip line method has proved its usefulness in estimating the ultimate bearing capacity. For example, Sokolovskii developed the slip-line equations for a Coulomb failure criterion [3]; Salençon derived the slip-line equations for an arbitrary curved strength envelope [4]; Serrano & Olalla defined the slip-line equations for Hoek-Brown criterion [5]; and Serrano et al derived the slip-line equations for the modified Hoek-Brown criterion [6]. These mentioned efforts were focused on the linear Mohr-Coulomb (MC) failure criterion, in which effects of intermediate principal stress and discontinuities on rock strength are not taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%