1980
DOI: 10.1097/00007611-198008000-00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic Diagnosis of Obstructed Renal Duplication and Ureterocele

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, false positive results can still occur. False positives may represent either other congenital abnormalities or entirely normal kidneys [ 16 , 17 ]. There is evidence that MRI is superior to ultrasonography for the diagnosis of duplex kidneys in children [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, false positive results can still occur. False positives may represent either other congenital abnormalities or entirely normal kidneys [ 16 , 17 ]. There is evidence that MRI is superior to ultrasonography for the diagnosis of duplex kidneys in children [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of US and CDDS has signifi cantly improved the diagnostic accuracy at all levels of the urinary tract. Besides, the cystic nature of the UC as well as its anatomical topography renders the method ideal for the assessment of this abnormality [9,10] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main differential of this entity is Ureterocele [9] , which is congenital dilatation of the distal most part of the ureter. The dilated portion of the ureter may herniate into the bladder secondary to the abnormal structure of vesicoureteric junction (VUJ).…”
Section: Differential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%