Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-396487-8.00013-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic Exposimetry and Acoustic Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 90 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, PNP should be assessed in water at the same distance from the transducer as the target tissue, using a hydrophone. The measured output voltage is then converted to pressure by dividing the hydrophone voltage by an appropriate sensitivity constant relative to the working frequency specific to the hydrophone 115 . Historically, it would be common to then derate the measured pressure by 0.3 dB cm -1 MHz -1 which represents a conservative average estimate of the overall attenuation of ultrasound power occurring in soft tissue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, PNP should be assessed in water at the same distance from the transducer as the target tissue, using a hydrophone. The measured output voltage is then converted to pressure by dividing the hydrophone voltage by an appropriate sensitivity constant relative to the working frequency specific to the hydrophone 115 . Historically, it would be common to then derate the measured pressure by 0.3 dB cm -1 MHz -1 which represents a conservative average estimate of the overall attenuation of ultrasound power occurring in soft tissue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%