2016
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2016.566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic irradiation for ultrafiltration membrane cleaning in MBR systems: operational conditions and consequences

Abstract: Ultrasonic irradiation is one of the most promising membrane cleaning techniques for membrane bioreactors (MBRs) because of several advantages such as high flux-recovery capacity and in situ application without interrupting the filtration process. However, significant contradictions may be found and, consequently, this method has not yet been widely developed. In this paper, four MBRs equipped with hollow-fibre polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes were operated continuously. The cleaning method ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, pretreatment of the wastewater by ultrasonic irradiation or by hybrid ultrasound methods prior to MBRs can decrease the organic loading of the wastewater and subsequently postpone the fouling of the membrane. Moreover, the ultrasonic method can be combined with other cleaning methods, i.e., chemical cleaning and backwashing, to improve the cleaning efficiency [174].…”
Section: Ultrasonic Cleaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, pretreatment of the wastewater by ultrasonic irradiation or by hybrid ultrasound methods prior to MBRs can decrease the organic loading of the wastewater and subsequently postpone the fouling of the membrane. Moreover, the ultrasonic method can be combined with other cleaning methods, i.e., chemical cleaning and backwashing, to improve the cleaning efficiency [174].…”
Section: Ultrasonic Cleaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are so many membrane cleaning methods reported in the literature: pneumatic cleaning [ 55 , 56 ], ultrasonic cleaning [ 57 , 58 ], sponge ball cleaning [ 59 , 60 ], and chemical cleaning [ 61 , 62 ] However, backflushing is the most accessible and cheaper technique to obtain maximum recovery among all. Anyhow, the effect of membrane cleaning methods on the NBR-GO membrane will be evaluated in the next study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultrasonic power intensity of 0.18 W cm −2 and the time of 3 min h −1 (i.e., operate 3 min for each hour) were considered as optimal. Ruiz et al [51] applied sonication at low power (15 W) with various frequencies (i.e., from 20 to 40 kHz) for the cleaning of fluorinated polyvinylidene membrane. The best control of transmembrane pressure was achieved at 20 kHz without significantly affecting membrane integrity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%