2020
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(19)30209-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis versus anticoagulation for the prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome (CAVA): a single-blind, multicentre, randomised trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
160
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
160
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…40 Similar results were seen in the smaller CAVA (Ultrasound-Accelerated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus Anticoagulation) trial. 41 The lack of efficacy and, moreover, the increased risk of major bleeding with the addition of catheter -directed thrombolysis to anticoagulation (3.3% vs 0%, 1.7% vs 0.3%, and 5% vs 0% in the CAVENT, ATTRACT, and CAVA trials, respectively), 38,40,41 support current guideline recommendations to consider thrombolysis only if the limb is threatened. 10 Given the increased risk of bleeding in elderly patients, this conservative approach can be likely extrapolated to patients aged over 75 years who were excluded from the CAVENT and ATTRACT trials and underrepresented in the CAVA trial (median [interquartile range] age, 52…”
Section: Definition Of the Elderly And Analyses For This Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…40 Similar results were seen in the smaller CAVA (Ultrasound-Accelerated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus Anticoagulation) trial. 41 The lack of efficacy and, moreover, the increased risk of major bleeding with the addition of catheter -directed thrombolysis to anticoagulation (3.3% vs 0%, 1.7% vs 0.3%, and 5% vs 0% in the CAVENT, ATTRACT, and CAVA trials, respectively), 38,40,41 support current guideline recommendations to consider thrombolysis only if the limb is threatened. 10 Given the increased risk of bleeding in elderly patients, this conservative approach can be likely extrapolated to patients aged over 75 years who were excluded from the CAVENT and ATTRACT trials and underrepresented in the CAVA trial (median [interquartile range] age, 52…”
Section: Definition Of the Elderly And Analyses For This Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…38,39 These results were not confirmed in 2 recent trials. 40,41 The ATTRACT (Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis) trial, which randomized 692 patients with proximal DVT to receive pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (ie, catheter -directed lysis, mechanical thrombus removal, or both) plus anticoagulation or anticoagulation alone, showed no difference between the treatment arms with regard to occurrence of recurrent VTE, mortality, postthrombotic syndrome, and quality of life between 6 and 24 months after diagnosis. 40 Similar results were seen in the smaller CAVA (Ultrasound-Accelerated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus Anticoagulation) trial.…”
Section: Definition Of the Elderly And Analyses For This Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by the fact that venous stenting was and still is a relatively new treatment modality that is not yet performed on a large scale. However, although over time venous stenting is being performed more frequently and experience with these procedures has increased, the risk of developing in‐stent thrombosis following venous stent placement remains high 9 . Another limitation associated with the small sample size is the fact that it is impossible to assess the contribution of specific characteristics of the stents used (eg, type, material, length, diameter), or the interventions performed (eg, stented vein segments, used technique, achieved patency) to the development of in‐stent thrombosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite adequate conservative treatment involving early anticoagulation, early compression therapy, and early mobilization, PTS will develop in 25%‐50% of patients with an acute iliofemoral DVT 6‐8 . Venous stenting can be performed in the acute phase as an adjunct to catheter‐directed thrombolysis (CDT), when there is underlying venous pathology (ie, iliac vein compression syndromes), or in the chronic phase to alleviate complaints when residual venous obstruction due to postthrombotic changes are present 9‐13 . Venous stenting is most frequently considered for chronic deep venous obstructions, either due to compression syndromes, acquired causes (eg, postthrombotic synechiae), or congenital causes (eg, anatomic anomalies).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, major bleeding occurred in four patients in the ultrasound-assisted CDT group, whereas none occurred in the standard therapy group. 62 Taken together, these studies suggest that CDT and related techniques do not provide a significant clinical benefit that could justify use as the routine, first-line therapy for patients with DVT. However, in symptomatic patients with extensive thrombus (i.e., iliofemoral DVT), these procedures appear to provide better relief of presenting symptoms and may improve long-term QOL.…”
Section: Cather-directed Thrombolysis In Gi Cancer-associated Vtementioning
confidence: 95%