Objective-To compare quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements in adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) with that in healthy control subjects and to determine the utility of QUS as a tool to evaluate skeletal status in these patients.Study design-Female adolescents with AN (n = 41) and healthy control subjects (n = 105) were recruited. Speed of sound (SOS) was measured at the radius and tibia. Participants with AN also had hip and spinal areal bone mineral density measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA); bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) was calculated.Results-Subjects with AN had higher mean radial SOS (4044 ± 99 m/s) than did control subjects (3947 ± 116 m/s; P < .0001). These results were replicated at the tibia (AN, 3918 ± 85 m/ s vs control subjects, 3827 ± 106 m/s; P < .0001). Neither DXA measures of areal bone mineral density nor BMAD were correlated with SOS. Weight and body mass index were negative predictors of tibial but not radial SOS. AN status remained a significant predictor of SOS after controlling for body mass index, age, and race.Conclusions-Subjects with AN had higher mean tibial and radial SOS than did control subjects. QUS variables did not correlate with DXA measures, calculated BMAD, or anthropometric variables. QUS measurements of SOS do not appear to be appropriate for bone density screening in patients with AN.Bone loss is a well-established complication of anorexia nervosa (AN). [1][2][3][4] Given that adolescence is the crucial time for establishment of peak bone mass, this loss is clinically significant and may place these young women at higher risk for fracture. 5 Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been the most widely used tool for assessment of bone mass in this patient population. DXA measures bone in two dimensions and allows for calculation of areal bone mineral density (aBMD, g/cm 2 ). The greatest challenge in the interpretation of aBMD in the adolescent age group is that it is highly influenced by bone and body size. [6][7][8] Additionally, although DXA measures are highly correlated with bone strength, strength depends on skeletal properties such as geometry, elasticity, and internal architecture, which are not reflected directly in DXA measurements. 9,10 Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is an attractive alternative method for the evaluation of skeletal status. QUS assesses peripheral bone by measuring the speed of sound (SOS) of an ultrasound wave as it is propagated along the bone. influenced by bone density, elasticity modulus, and the microarchitecture of bone. 7 Studies have shown that QUS can predict fracture risk in older women, independent of aBMD, and monitor skeletal responses to exercise with good sensitivity. [11][12][13][14] The use of QUS is appealing because of its portability, speed, low cost, and lack of ionizing radiation. QUS could also be used as a screening tool for low bone mass or provide information beyond that obtained by current bone density measurement techniques. However, to our knowledge, this modality has not b...