2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-assisted packed-bed extraction of hypericin from Hypericum perforatum L. and optimization by response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Adj R-Squared (Radj 2 ) was close to R 2 , implying reasonable adjustment of the model to the experimental data [46]. The "Lack of Fit F-value" of 0.13 implies the lack-of-fit was not significant relative to the pure error, indicating that the experimental error is very small and the suitability of the model to accurately predict variation [43,47]. The F value of the model was 117.59, which indicates that the model is extremely significant with a probability of 0.01%.…”
Section: Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, Adj R-Squared (Radj 2 ) was close to R 2 , implying reasonable adjustment of the model to the experimental data [46]. The "Lack of Fit F-value" of 0.13 implies the lack-of-fit was not significant relative to the pure error, indicating that the experimental error is very small and the suitability of the model to accurately predict variation [43,47]. The F value of the model was 117.59, which indicates that the model is extremely significant with a probability of 0.01%.…”
Section: Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Adjusted was determined to be 0.9862 and 0.9546 for nitrate and phosphate removal, respectively, and these values are close to 1. The statistical suitability of the model is determined from the closeness of the R 2 Adjusted values to the R 2 [43]. The value of adequate precision of 44.905 and 27.433 (which are greater than 4), for nitrate removal and phosphate removal, respectively, indicates an adequate signal.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After cooling, the combined filtrates were concentrated using a rotary evaporator and then freeze-dried. The solvent choice and concentration were based on scientific literature data [19,30,39,42,43]. The extraction yield is expressed as the percentage of the total mass of the dry extract (M ext without water content) with respect to the mass of the raw material (M pv ) loaded onto to the flask for solvent extraction: Y% = (M ext /M pv ) × 100.…”
Section: Vegetal Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%