El Amparo De Tierras: La Acción, El Proceso Y El Juez De Restitución 2015
DOI: 10.7476/9789587386752.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Un poco de contexto: los modelos del régimen de la tierra y su despojo en Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These groups did not operate in political and social isolation but were often supported financially and otherwise by rural elites, support that was legitimized by assertions of self‐defence and counterinsurgency (Counter, 2019). In their study on ‘agrarian elite participation’ in Colombia's civil war, Francisco Gutiérrez‐Sanín and Jenniffer Vargas (2017) show that large‐scale cattle ranchers participated directly in the development and actions of the paramilitaries, as leaders of the units, or as the promoters and final beneficiaries of coercive land dispossession (see also Quinche Roa et al, 2018). Gutiérrez‐Sanín and Vargas state that one central motivation for the agrarian elite to accumulate land by dispossession was to expand landownership in order to—sooner or later—derive ‘legal’ economic benefits from it, by pocketing state subsidies, putting it to productive use or through speculation (see also Richani, 2012).…”
Section: Mining Landed Property Coercive and Speculative Land Disposs...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These groups did not operate in political and social isolation but were often supported financially and otherwise by rural elites, support that was legitimized by assertions of self‐defence and counterinsurgency (Counter, 2019). In their study on ‘agrarian elite participation’ in Colombia's civil war, Francisco Gutiérrez‐Sanín and Jenniffer Vargas (2017) show that large‐scale cattle ranchers participated directly in the development and actions of the paramilitaries, as leaders of the units, or as the promoters and final beneficiaries of coercive land dispossession (see also Quinche Roa et al, 2018). Gutiérrez‐Sanín and Vargas state that one central motivation for the agrarian elite to accumulate land by dispossession was to expand landownership in order to—sooner or later—derive ‘legal’ economic benefits from it, by pocketing state subsidies, putting it to productive use or through speculation (see also Richani, 2012).…”
Section: Mining Landed Property Coercive and Speculative Land Disposs...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular form of this is ‘administrative dispossession’ (del Pilar Peña‐Huertas et al, 2017), where state actors are central agents of dispossession. In Colombia, legal dispossession has been critically discussed in relation to the role of the Colombian Institute for Agrarian Reform (Instituto Colombiano de la Reforma Agrarian [INCORA]; later the Colombian Institute for Rural Development, Instituto Colombiano de Desarrollo Rural [INCODER]) (Grajales, 2011, 2016; Quinche Roa et al, 2018).…”
Section: Mining Landed Property Coercive and Speculative Land Disposs...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation