2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01221.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty Analysis Based on Probability Bounds (P‐Box) Approach in Probabilistic Safety Assessment

Abstract: A wide range of uncertainties will be introduced inevitably during the process of performing a safety assessment of engineering systems. The impact of all these uncertainties must be addressed if the analysis is to serve as a tool in the decision-making process. Uncertainties present in the components (input parameters of model or basic events) of model output are propagated to quantify its impact in the final results. There are several methods available in the literature, namely, method of moments, discrete p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first method, Monte Carlo simulation with 10 6 iterations have been carried out which gave 10 6 sample of inputs (x 1 , x 2 … x 9 ) and associated system output (y i ), where 'i' denotes iteration number. Pearson correlation coefficient has been calculated with the Eq.…”
Section: Application To a Practical Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first method, Monte Carlo simulation with 10 6 iterations have been carried out which gave 10 6 sample of inputs (x 1 , x 2 … x 9 ) and associated system output (y i ), where 'i' denotes iteration number. Pearson correlation coefficient has been calculated with the Eq.…”
Section: Application To a Practical Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To handle the propagation of uncertainties in PSA in the presence of correlations, only three of above mentioned methods are useful: (i) Method of moments [6][7][8], (ii) P-box approach [9,10] and (iii) Monte Carlo simulation. There are several strategies a Monte Carlo analyst can use to account for knowledge and uncertainty about correlations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a kind of important random-interval hybrid reliability analysis problems is easily to obtain, and the efficient solution of this problem is of great significance for the reliability design of many complex products. Aiming at this problem, some numerical methods, including the function approximation method [22], the iterative rescaling method [23], and the probability bounds (p-box) approach [24], have been proposed for the lower and upper bounds estimation of the structural reliability in the presence of both random and interval variables. In addition, Luo et al [25] presented a combined probabilistic and set-valued description based on the multiellipsoid convex model description for grouped uncertain-but-bounded variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many research studies have been carried out on the HRA methods for structure [23][24][25][26]. The following numerical methods have been proposed: the function approximation technique [27], the probabilistic transformation technique [28][29][30], the iterative rescaling method [31], the probability bounds approach [32], the mixed perturbation Monte Carlo (MC) method [33], the optimization algorithm with single-layer nesting [34,35], two-layer nesting [36,37], and the complex nesting [22], among others [38][39][40]. Nevertheless, the HRA with FORM is still in its infancy, as there are some calculating problems in the practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%