2017
DOI: 10.1002/joc.5069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty assessment for climate change impact on intense precipitation: how many model runs do we need?

Abstract: Precipitation projections are typically obtained from general circulation model (GCM) outputs under different future scenarios, then downscaled for hydrological applications to a watershed or site‐specific scale. However, uncertainties in projections are known to be present and need to be quantified. Although GCMs are commonly considered the major contributor of uncertainty for hydrological impact assessment of climate change, other uncertainty sources must be taken into account for a thorough understanding of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ntegeka et al [20] described and used tailored climate change scenarios to limit the number of future scenarios. Hosseinzadehtalaei et al [21] calculated the response of extreme precipitation to future climate change through sensitivity and uncertainty analysis on GCM, initial conditions of the GCM and representative concentration pathways (RCPs). However, the source and contribution of uncertainties in the context of climate change and the inherent impact on hydrology are regionally dependent, and more in-depth research is needed [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ntegeka et al [20] described and used tailored climate change scenarios to limit the number of future scenarios. Hosseinzadehtalaei et al [21] calculated the response of extreme precipitation to future climate change through sensitivity and uncertainty analysis on GCM, initial conditions of the GCM and representative concentration pathways (RCPs). However, the source and contribution of uncertainties in the context of climate change and the inherent impact on hydrology are regionally dependent, and more in-depth research is needed [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most of the papers in the past focused on historical and present changes (Manton et al, 2001;Łupikasza et al, 2011;Milanovic et al, 2015;Alexander, 2016), an increasing number of studies are currently conducted to highlight future changes and their estimated impacts (Zhang et al, 2011;Kitoh and Endo, 2016;Łupikasza, 2016;Scripc a et al, 2016;Hosseinzadehtalaei et al, 2017a;2017b). Several research papers were developed at a regional scale, such as for Eastern Europe or at the country scale (Busuioc et al, 2010;Costa et al, 2012;Huang et al, 2012;Iizumi et al, 2012;Ivanova and Alexandrov, 2012;Villarini, 2012;Rao et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014;Li et al, 2015;Ning et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher sensitivity of subdaily precipitation extremes to warming climate has more significant implications for urban storm water designs (Fadhel et al, 2017). The stationary atmospheric conditions which were previously considered for storm water design values may lead to an underestimation of risks (Cheng & AghaKouchak, 2014;Hosseinzadehtalaei et al, 2017Hosseinzadehtalaei et al, , 2018. Despite the implications of climate warming on subdaily precipitation extremes, it remains unclear how the urban storm water designs will be affected if GMT increases to 1.5 and 2.0°C from the preindustrial level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%