2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0164-1212(01)00035-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding complex, real-world systems through asynchronous, distributed decision-making algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In asynchronous decision-making, agents/robots take decision in an event-driven scheme, as opposed to a synchronous approach where all robots need to take decisions at fixed intervals. The asynchronous decision-making is critical in most real-world settings, due to the presence of stochastic action effects and imperfect and unreliable communication [26]. In addition, it has been shown that having asynchronous parallel sampling in Bayesian optimization (the motivating algorithm behind our proposed search method) can improve the optimization progress in comparison to synchronous implementations [27].…”
Section: Objective Of Thismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In asynchronous decision-making, agents/robots take decision in an event-driven scheme, as opposed to a synchronous approach where all robots need to take decisions at fixed intervals. The asynchronous decision-making is critical in most real-world settings, due to the presence of stochastic action effects and imperfect and unreliable communication [26]. In addition, it has been shown that having asynchronous parallel sampling in Bayesian optimization (the motivating algorithm behind our proposed search method) can improve the optimization progress in comparison to synchronous implementations [27].…”
Section: Objective Of Thismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, during the execution of an activity, each subsystem assumes its own unique state (reflected by the data value of the variable, etc.) and none has knowledge of the exact state of the other subsystems (Ghosh, 2001). When activities that depend on several resources are required, then the modules that control these resources (as described in the previous section) have to communicate, in order to update their data and to synchronies their actions (inter-module communication).…”
Section: The Communication Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We formalize the cooperation policy setting as an Asynchronous Distributed Decision Making (ADDM) process [Ghosh, 2001, 2004] to enable peers to make decisions on their own cooperation policies rationally while in line with overall utility of the system. As depicted in Figure 1, to successfully formulate the cooperation policy setting as an ADDM problem, the key challenges are to define the globally optimal performance as the overall utility, to synthesize local objective of individual peers in line with it, and to design their interactions in form of a mechanism that coordinates asynchronous distributed decisions of individual peers and imposes distributed constraints to prevent them from making selfish decisions against the global objective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%