2016
DOI: 10.1177/2455265820160206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Dynamics of Mobile Banking Adoption by Youth: Empirical Evidence from India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobile banking (m-banking) has been defined as a robust system for banking and financial services [12]. Thus, utilizing these services is crucially important for both investors and service providers, and a powerful tool for financial inclusion.…”
Section: Significance Of Mobile Bankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile banking (m-banking) has been defined as a robust system for banking and financial services [12]. Thus, utilizing these services is crucially important for both investors and service providers, and a powerful tool for financial inclusion.…”
Section: Significance Of Mobile Bankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides BI, theories like TCT, ECM, TAM and TTF were used to predict continuance intention (Baabdullah et al, 2019b; Foroughi et al, 2019; Mohammadi, 2015b; Susanto et al, 2016). Apart from this, attitude (Bhardwaj & Aggarwal, 2016; Changchit et al, 2017; Chawla & Joshi, 2018), satisfaction (Khan et al, 2018; Masrek et al, 2014), resistance to adopt (Chaouali & Souiden, 2019; Cruz et al, 2010), customer loyalty (Baabdullah et al, 2019a), initial trust (Zhou, 2012) and trust (Malaquias & Hwang, 2016a; 2016b) were also kept as dependent variables and predicted the same with relevant independent variables.…”
Section: Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Majority of the researchers have adopted TAM and extended the same using additional constructs such as trust (Azad, 2016;Sharma et al, 2017;Siyal et al, 2019a;Zhang et al, 2018), perceived risk (Alalwan et al, 2016;Mohammadi, 2015aMohammadi, , 2015bPriya et al, 2018), compatibility (Azad, 2016;Mohammadi, 2015aMohammadi, , 2015bSharma et al, 2017), social influence (Azad, 2016;Bhardwaj & Aggarwal, 2016;Gu et al, 2009;Kumar et al, 2017), awareness, resistance (Elhajjar & Ouaida, 2019;Siyal et al, 2019b) and perceived self-efficacy (Alalwan et al, 2016;Saji & Paul, 2018) to determine BI. The UTAUT constructs (PE, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions) as well as the additional constructs embedded in UTAUT2 (habit, hedonic motivation and price value) were also validated as influencing factors of BI mobile banking (Alalwan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If online merchants understand the characteristics influencing young consumers' purchasing behaviour, as well as the relationships between these aspects and the types of items, they may improve their marketing efforts to turn prospective consumers into engaged users. Regardless of the fact that internet shopping has numerous advantages, a large number of people are resistant to this change [1,2]. The present business climate is becoming more competitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%