Understanding industrialised house building as a company’s dynamic capabilities

Abstract

Purpose To further the understanding of industrialised house building (IHB) from a temporal, emergent corporate-ability perspective, this study aims to trace the build-up of corporate assets in an IHB company over time. The research draws on dynamic capabilities, acknowledging not only what assets the company have developed and currently are exploiting, but also how these assets were develop and managed (i.e. enhanced, combined, protected and potentially reconfigured) to sustain long-term competitiveness. Design/methodology/approach A case study design was used to form a narrative that covers the evolution of an IHB company over a 25-year period. Corporate archival material, analysis of original data from a large number of research studies during 1993-2013 and retrospective reflections of owners and managers, including crosschecking interpretations of archival material, developed and triangulated the narrative. Findings The study presents rich empirical findings on the build-up of corporate assets. Starting from a successive process of exploration and exploitation formation of dynamic capabilities eventually played out into an exponential dynamic capability build-up. The IHB case company displays the ability to not only continuously exploit and renew resources and competences, but also to sense, seize and reconfigure cumulative assets over time. The exponential development of dynamic capabilities resonates to literature on higher-order dynamic capabilities implying that: the accumulated and higher-order dynamic capabilities are difficult to imitate and a (any) company must possess higher-order dynamic capabilities to be able to exploit and/or take up IHB. Originality/value The study is complementing and potentially challenging frequent framings of the IHB concept. Previous research has addressed and characterised IHB mainly by encapsulating a moment in time and, thus, characteristics are momentary and represent static views on IHB. However, IHB has seen a strong development over the past 25 years, and the study reflects on this development from the perspective of one of the IHB-forerunner companies in Sweden. By exploring from a company perspective the developments, reconfiguration and capacity to develop/reconfigure over time in a changing environment, the study introduces an alternative understanding of IHB as dynamic capabilities.

Indonesian Hotels’ Dynamic Capability under the Risks of COVID-19

“…The supporting infrastructure may play a role in cultivating innovative behavior (Singh and Sarkar 2019) from workers' happiness (Bani-Melhem et al 2018). Ziyae et al (2021) posit that the existing infrastructure is essential in creating dynamic capability in the hotel industry, manufacturing business (Anand et al 2009), or real estate business (Stehn et al 2021). These conversations add positive support for hypothesis formulation.…”

Consumer housing values and prejudices against living in wooden homes in the Nordic region

“…MSWB is expected to bring new business opportunities both for wood and building industries, increase resource-efficiency of the building processes and in the use of houses, and enhance well-being of builders and residents (Lähtinen et al 2016;Evison et al 2018;Rhee 2018). Due to industrialized processes (e.g., prefabrication, off-site production) (Brege et al 2013;Kuzman and Sandberg 2017) wood building may renew the whole construction sector (Stehn et al 2020), if companies have capabilities to adjust their strategies to meet the changing expectations in the business environment (Toppinen et al 2019).…”

The Future of Wood Construction: Opportunities and Barriers Based on Surveys in Europe and Chile

“…Many traditional barriers to wood construction, such as perceptions concerning fire safety, acoustics, and durability, as well as a lack of business skills, have either faded or disappeared during the last decade in countries with a longer history of building with wood [14,42,101]. The influence of architects and designers on the choice of building materials has been reported to still be very strong [51,85,102,103].…”